Can Facebook and China be friends?

China, the world's biggest Internet market, is a huge draw for Facebook as it prepares to go public, but Beijing is deeply suspicious of social networks that lie beyond the control of the ruling Communist Party.

Paul Sakuma/AP/File
This December 2011 file photo, shows a worker inside Facebook headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif. China, the world’s biggest Internet market, with more than half a billion citizens online, could be a gold mine for Facebook as it prepares to go public.

Of all the factors that will decide Facebook’s potential market value as it prepares to sell shares to the public, few weigh as heavily as China.

On the one hand, the world’s biggest Internet market, with more than half a billion citizens online, could be a gold mine. On the other, the social media giant could reach those users only by bowing to strict Chinese censorship, risking a costly blow to its international reputation.

Facebook is clearly tempted. Its filing to the SEC this week mentioned China nine times. “China is a large potential market for Facebook” and “we continue to evaluate entering China,” the document said.

But the company is also dubious about its prospects for success there. “We do not know if we will be able to find an approach to manage content and information that will be acceptable to us and to the Chinese government,” it acknowledges.

Strong dragon must beware local snakes

Nor would China be a pushover even if Facebook did decide to compete here, warns Kuang Wenbo, a professor of Internet studies at Beijing’s Renmin University. A number of local Facebook clones have already firmly established themselves, he points out, quoting a Chinese proverb: “A strong dragon cannot beat a local snake.”

Facebook has been blocked in China for nearly three years, making it inaccessible to the vast majority of local Internet users who do not use sophisticated software to circumvent the “Great Firewall” that online censors have erected.

The government here is deeply suspicious of outfits such as Facebook that offer platforms to build social networks beyond the control of the ruling Communist Party.

Policymakers will likely be even more nervous when they read Mark Zuckerberg’s letter to potential investors, in which the Facebook founder this week set out his vision of “a more honest and transparent dialogue around government that could lead to more direct empowerment of people.”

Path to compromise?

But Facebook has never taken up the cudgels on behalf of human rights and freedom of expression in the public way that Google and Twitter have done, and “by saying they are thinking about China despite the complications, they show they are keen and would try to find a compromise,” says Jon Russell, Asia editor of The Next Web, a leading online publication focusing on Internet technology.

“They’d have to follow local rules” that require websites to censor members’ comments and photos to avoid politically and socially sensitive topics, warns Isaac Mao, an expert on the Chinese Internet. “But if they find a good local partner, perhaps they could find a new way to deal with this problem.”

Mr. Mao hopes that Facebook will try “to tinker with the rules, to see if they can introduce something new,” to act as a counterweight to Chinese social media that he says seem only too willing to do the government’s bidding. How that might be achieved, however, he is not sure.

Hard questions

Meanwhile, “it is still doubtful whether Facebook can be as successful in China as it is in other parts of the world,” suggests Professor Kuang, who points out that Google could never rival local copycat search engine Baidu before it withdrew from China, complaining that local Gmail accounts belonging to dissidents had been hacked.

“If they don’t move soon it will be very difficult for Facebook to get into the Chinese market,” adds Mao. “It will be very hard and very expensive for them to take over the user base” that local competitors such as RenTen and QQ have already established in a mature market.

In an interview last November with Charlie Rose’s PBS TV program, Mr. Zuckerberg said going into China would raise “hard questions.

“But since, for right now, we’re not available, and we don’t have an immediate path to become available, these are not policy decisions we have to make,” he added. “At some point I think there would be some discussion around what it would take to go there, and then we’d at that point have to figure out whether we were willing to do that.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.