Guatemala Congress strips President Molina of immunity

Amid a widening corruption scandal, Guatemalan lawmakers voted Tuesday to rescind President Otta Perez Molina's immunity from prosecution, opening him up to criminal charges. 

Moises Castillo/AP Photo
Demonstrators react in jubilation in front of the Guatemalan Congress building the as they hear the news that Congress has voted to withdraw President Otto Perez Molina's immunity from prosecution, in Guatemala City, Tuesday, Sept. 1, 2015. Perez Molina's government has been beset by a series of corruption cases, but until now he has been immune to prosecution as president.

Guatemala's Congress voted to withdraw President Otto Perez Molina's immunity from prosecution Tuesday in connection with a widening customs corruption scandal that has rocked his administration and the country's political system.

With at least 105 of the 158 votes in Congress needed to approve the measure, 132 lawmakers backed the measure.

It does not remove Mr. Perez Molina, who denies any wrongdoing, from office, but instead means that prosecutors can file criminal charges against him just like any other citizen.

"The party gave us permission to vote and withdraw the president's immunity," said Luis Fernandez Chenal, a lawmaker with Perez Molina's ruling party. "He who owes nothing, fears nothing."

About 200 people outside the capitol cheered and set off firecrackers as news of the vote reached them.

"Excellent! It is a step forward for Guatemala," said Gerardo Corzo, a retiree.

The customs graft scandal has already claimed the job of Perez Molina's former Vice President Roxana Baldetti, who is in jail awaiting trial on accusations she accepted millions in bribes in return for letting others avoid import duties. A number of Cabinet officials have also left office.

Massive protests have demanded Perez Molina resign and a postponement of this coming Sunday's elections, but he has refused to do so.

"This decision demonstrates that the people and their collective actions can get results, but this is just the beginning," said activist Byron Garon. "Now we want him and his vice president to be tried and convicted, and for them to give back to Guatemala all that they stole."

Earlier in the day, civilians formed a wall of bodies to let lawmakers into Congress, protecting them from dozens of presidential loyalists who had blocked access to the capitol since the morning in a bid to delay the proceedings.

Interior Department Vice Minister Elmer Sosa also arrived with riot police to "guarantee the safety of protesters and Congress," and lawmakers were finally able to go inside and begin the session.

"It was impressive that the people themselves came and created a human chain and a path so we could enter," said opposition legislator Leonel Lira.

Government agents have had to step in on several occasions to keep backers and critics of the president away from each other.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.