El Salvador struggles to keep business investment at home

In order to kickstart El Salvador's economy, convincing local investors to keep their money at home could be critical first step.

• A version of this post ran on the author's blog, centralamericanpolitics.blogspot.com. The views expressed are the author's own.

The United States and El Salvador, as well as the Salvadoran private sector, clearly see increased foreign direct investment as necessary to kick-starting the Salvadoran economy. The first Millennium Challenge Corporation compact for the northern region of the country and the second proposed compact for coastal and maritime areas are designed to provide needed investments in infrastructure that will encourage foreign direct investment.

The Partnership for Growth is also designed to tackle insecurity and corruption that will then lead to more investment and better returns on investments. Those investments will create jobs and, hopefully, improve conditions so that Salvadorans lead better lives and fewer leave (among other benefits).

However, I was speaking with someone yesterday who reminded me just how difficult this is going to be. Here is Raul Gallegos from February:

The country's business leaders are no visionaries either.

Many local entrepreneurs sold out to foreign companies and invest their money in Nicaragua or Costa Rica rather than at home.

El Salvador's investment levels, at 14 percent of GDP, are low compared with peers.

But no one can blame the business community: As economist Ricardo Hausmann has put it, El Salvador is a "low-return country" with a lack of productive investments or profitable opportunities.

Many Salvadoran businessmen seem to have cashed out their business investments in the 1990s and early 2000s. Since then, they have instead been investing in neighboring countries where their potential returns on investments are perceived to be much greater. I don't know how true this holds up to more systematic analysis but it sure passes the smell test.

Anyway, yesterday, the person was telling me about Salvadoran friends of his whose family is seriously concerned with the new FMLN government headed by Salvador Sanchez Ceren. They remain fearful that he and the FMLN intend to turn the country into another Venezuela. They are worried about increasing corruption, insecurity, and the greater potential for nationalizations of private businesses. As a result, they have been moving assets out of the country.

Now I don't know the details, but when I think of all the resources that the US and international community, including ALBA, are investing in this small Central American country, it is going to be all for nothing if Salvadoran economic actors do not invest themselves. It doesn't help if foreign investments are simply replacing national investment as I fear has been occurring these last few years and the potential for which will only increase under the FMLN's Sanchez Ceren.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.