Why El Salvador's first-round electoral powerhouse is no sure thing in runoff

El Salvador's left-wing candidate won 49 percent of the vote, just short of the majority needed to secure victory in this weekend's election. The next round isn't expected to be an easy win.

Henry Romero/REUTERS
Salvador Sánchez Cerén, presidential candidate for the Farabundo Marti Front for National Liberation (FMLN), speaks to his supporters after the official results in San Salvador February 3, 2014. A former left-wing guerrilla commander had a strong lead in El Salvador's presidential election on Sunday and heads into a run-off vote well positioned to defeat a conservative rival who wants to fight powerful street gangs with the army.

El Salvador's left-wing candidate, current Vice President Salvador Sánchez Cerén, overwhelmingly beat his right-wing rival in elections yesterday, but fell a few points shy of the more than 50 percent support needed to avoid a runoff.

Mr. Sánchez Cerén, of the ruling Farabundo Martí Liberation Front (FMLN), will face his main opponent again in a March 9 runoff after winning 49 percent of votes Sunday. Norman Quijano, the conservative National Republican Alliance (ARENA) party candidate and mayor of San Salvador, came in second with 39 percent of the vote, a much wider gap than polls previously predicted.

The social programs FMLN has instituted over its five years in power, including giving milk and school supplies to children, appeared to have resonated with voters, even as the country is gripped by gang violence and high levels of insecurity, and a sluggish economy.

“This is a government that is doing something for us,” says Sara Silvia Calles, an FMLN supporter in Soyapango, outside San Salvador. “We have seen how they help the poor.”

Yet Sánchez Cerén, a former guerilla commander, is not assured a victory in the runoff election against Mr. Quijano. A third party candidate, former President Antonio Saca, may have been siphoning off votes from the right in the election yesterday.

Mr. Saca, a former president and ARENA member who ran under his newly founded Unity party, came in a distant third with just over 11 percent support. But his 300,000 voters could be crucial in a runoff, which Sánchez Cerén acknowledged during a speech to supporters late last night.

“I say to Tony Saca and to Unity,” Sánchez Cerén said, “[that] in this second round we are going to work with you ... and we are going to keep widening our alliances.”

Though Saca called Sánchez Cerén to congratulate him on his victory, it is uncertain how many of his followers would vote for the FMLN.

Security matters

A tense, mud-slinging campaign gave way to organized and peaceful elections Sunday. In Soyapango, a crowded working class district east of the capital, one sports complex turned voting center had a downright festive atmosphere. Lines of voters moved briskly as music blared and a scout troop worked the crowd peddling pupusas, traditional Salvadoran stuffed tortillas.

Police and soldiers, meanwhile, kept a close eye on the site. Soyapango has long been contested territory for the country’s two largest and most dangerous gangs, the Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13) and Barrio 18.

Soyapango is where these gangs took root about 20 years ago and where their presence continues to be felt heavily. Several of those voting Sunday had stories of being threatened by members of one or both groups in recent years.

But – perhaps representative of the broader electorate – voters were divided on which party offered the right solution.

Ana Luisa Mendoza, a mother of two girls who has lived in Soyapango for 35 years, says she has received hand-written notes placed under her door demanding specific sums of money and late-night phone calls.

“The terrible thing is you can't even move,” Ms. Mendoza says. “When you get to the next neighborhood the maras are there and want to know who’s in your family, where you come from."  

Teresa Martinez, a 75-year-old resident, says that one of the gangs “asked me for $800 and demanded it the next day. Thank god they never came to collect it.”

Both Ms. Martinez and Mendoza say they were voting for ARENA’s Mr. Quijano, who spent much of his campaign bashing the FMLN for its role in a controversial gang truce, and has promised to deploy the army against street gangs.

Quijano’s weaker-than-expected showing on Sunday, however, suggests that focusing solely on security issues may not be enough to win him the runoff.

Martinez’s husband, construction worker Misail Mendoza, says that he, for one, is not convinced by ARENA’s stance.

An FMLN supporter, he says a Sánchez Cerén government would respond to the gangs by putting more police on the streets, and that the hardline policies of past ARENA governments are not a solution.

"As a Christian, I believe in forgiveness,” Mr. Mendoza says, “and people deserve a second chance.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.