Gold medals, gold standards: Soccer brings role reversal for Mexico and Brazil

Mexico took its first gold medal today with its stunning win over Brazil in soccer, bringing a burst of joy to a struggling nation.

Andrew Medichini/AP
Mexican soccer players celebrate after winning the gold medal in the 2012 London Olympics.
Rich Clabaugh/Staff

The Olympic glory of “El Tri,” reads the banner over Mexico's conservative daily Reforma online, a photo of Mexico's winning soccer team donning their newly earned gold medals. Further to the left, El Universal declares: “They made history!”

“We are made of gold,” splashes Milenio.

Soccer-crazed Mexico took home its first gold medal today, with the men's tricolor (named such for the colors of Mexico's red, white, and green flag) beating the storied Brazilian team in the Olympic finals.

Spontaneous celebrations were reported across the country, from downtown Mexico City to the streets of Guadalajara, with fans carrying flags and shouting victory songs in marches that shut down traffic.

Mexico beat Brazil 2-1, with two goals by player Oribe Peralta – one just seconds into the game, another in the second half – bringing a sense of badly desired success to this struggling country, and maybe signaling a reversal in fortunes for Mexico and its long-lauded southerly neighbor Brazil.

Are you Olympic gold material? Take our quiz!

Brazil has been Latin America's golden child for the past five years. It will host the World Cup in 2014 and the Olympic Games two years later. Its economy has boomed. Investors have flocked to it. The celebratory headlines have not died down.

In the same period, Mexico has struggled amid slower economic growth and historic violence, which has made the country ground zero for hemispheric organized crime. Its death toll alone: over 50,000 in six years.

 It is with a certain amount of envy that Mexico has looked at Brazil. But now tides seem to be changing. Recent headlines are calling Mexico's slow and steady economy the stable one. “Why investors love Mexico,” reads a recent one from Forbes. From Mercopress today: “Mexico Ousts Brazil as Investors’ Top Choice in Latin America.”

 And this Saturday, at least in the afterglow of today's game, the change in moods could not be clearer.

“This has been the highest point of my career. To sing the national anthem with a gold medal around your neck is priceless,” said Mexico coach Luis Fernando Tena to Bloomberg News.  “Winning this gold medal on the sacred pitch of Wembley makes it even more special. This is a fair reward for my 18 warriors.”

 It was a big game for both Latin American countries: Mexico was the underdog, making history by even getting to the finals. But for all its sterling reputation in the world of soccer, Brazil had never won the Olympic gold, either.

Brazil made it to the finals in both 1984 and 1988, but lost to France in Los Angeles and to the Soviet Union during the Seoul games. Its next chance is on home turf during the 2016 games in Rio de Janeiro.

And by then, it, not Mexico, could be the clear underdog - both on and off the field.

IN PICTURES; Today at the Olympics

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.