Women make splash in Mexico's elections

Mexico is facing a milestone for women as it fields its first female candidate from a major party in the July 1 presidential election. But women are vying to make an impact in local elections as well.

Alejandro Acosta/REUTERS/File
Candidate for congress Natalia Juarez of the Democratic Revolution Party (PRD) talks to Reuters TV while sitting in front of a campaign poster with a photograph of herself in Guadalajara on May 23.

Mexico may be fielding its first female candidate from a major party for president, a milestone for women in politics here, but there is just as much buzz for female candidates at the local level.

In the conservative city of Guadalajara, one candidate even opted to go topless to get attention for her bid to congress. Even though she's been criticized for objectifying women, she sees it differently. “We had to do something that would have an impact,” says Natalia Juárez of the leftist Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD), as campaigning wrapped up before Sunday's race. Mexicans will vote this weekend for a new president, governors in a handful of states, and a whole new congress.

Ms. Juárez raised eyebrows recently when she disseminated provocative photos during her campaign. The first, a billboard image of the candidate and six other women nude from the waist up, their left hands covering breasts, brought widespread attention. Similarly controversial images followed.

For some women it showed she would be an honest politician, with nothing to hide. But not all of the reaction was positive. Critics from around the world accused her of objectifying women for political gain. But Juárez, a philosophy professor at the University of Guadalajara, shrugs off criticism. Her intention was to fight prejudices and “help demystify the feminine body,” she says.

She acknowledges that disrobing as a campaign tactic is a radical notion for some, but it’s not the only unconventional proposition Juárez advocates. She also supports the legalization of drugs, particularly marijuana, as a way to combat the country’s spiraling drug violence. And she believes it’s time the country focused more attention on the rights of women and gays.

On Wednesday, the last day of campaigning in Mexico, Juárez shook hands with dozens of vendors at a bustling market in the heart of the city. But she spoke little of the more controversial aspects of her campaign. Instead, she distributed yellow backpacks with her party’s logo and took shots at the more powerful political parties, promising to work for progress in her diverse district.

“It’s time for change,” she told Sandra Flores Mendoza, who was selling a variety of fresh produce at the market.

Ms. Flores, who clutched a campaign leaflet of Juárez’s nude photo in her hands, says she plans to vote for the professor.

“Her photo says a lot about her,” says the vendor. “It says she is bold and uninhibited; that can serve her well in Congress. I think she’s a strong candidate who has nothing to hide.”

After chatting with Juárez nearby, vendor Pedro Mejia Rodriguez says he likes what he hears. But he views her use of nudity to try to win votes as immoral.

“People's actions, their work, should speak for themselves," he says. "Is the next step to get naked in Congress?”

Not a chance, Juárez says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.