Can Argentina’s workers stop new president’s drive to reshape economy?

Javier Milei is facing an uprising of unions and other workers just two months into his presidency. It’s an early test of his resolve on plans to deregulate Argentina’s state-run economy and challenge workers’ autonomy. 

|
Natacha Pisarenko/AP
Demonstrators gather outside Congress during a national strike against the economic and labor reforms proposed by Argentine President Javier Milei's government in Buenos Aires, Argentina, Wednesday, Jan. 24, 2024.

Argentina’s President Javier Milei faced a one-day general strike Jan. 24 protesting his decree targeting unions as well as his proposals for economic and labor law changes, showing that his opponents are wasting no time in trying to derail his austerity agenda.

The biggest union, known by its acronym CGT, organized the strike and was joined by other unions. Strikers took to the streets in the capital, Buenos Aires, and other cities across the country, joined by social groups and political opponents, including the Peronist party that dominated national politics for decades.

The walkout was Argentina’s first general strike in more than four years, and it was also the quickest ever to be organized in a president’s term since the return of democracy in 1983, according to a review by local media outlet Infobae. Mr. Milei’s predecessor, center-left Alberto Fernández, did not face any general strikes.

On Dec. 20, Mr. Milei issued a decree that would revoke or modify hundreds of existing laws so as to limit the power of unions and deregulate an economy featuring notoriously heavy state intervention. A court ruling has put the labor changes on hold. He also sent an omnibus bill to Congress that would enact sweeping reforms in the political, social, fiscal, legal, administrative, and security fields.

Until his presidential run, Mr. Milei, a libertarian economist, was known mostly for his televised screeds against the political caste, and he secured victory last year by a wide margin before taking office just over a month ago. A self-declared “anarcho-capitalist,” he pledged a drastic reduction in state spending aimed at shoring up a government budget deficit that he says is fueling red-hot inflation, which finished 2023 at 211%.

While people have legitimate grievances – triple-digit inflation and a steep devaluation of Argentina’s peso – behind the scenes the main impetus for the strike was the president’s drive to weaken union power, Buenos Aires-based political analyst Sergio Berensztein said.

“For union leaders what is at stake is really a lot. If they don’t complain, their bargaining capacity is going to drop dramatically and their influence in politics is going to dwindle,” Mr. Berensztein told The Associated Press in a phone interview. “Milei feels quite comfortable confronting these leaders. He’s still very popular; union leaders are unpopular.”

“We’re going to lose more rights that we worked for,” teacher Karina Villagra told AP in a plaza in front of Congress. “The militancy should be stronger than ever.”

Mr. Milei won the runoff election with 56% of the votes, and in his inaugural address told Argentina that things would get worse before improving. Two separate polls this month show he retains support of more than half of respondents despite accelerating inflation and mass layoffs announced at state-owned firms.

Security Minister Patricia Bullrich on Jan. 24 accused strike organizers of being “mafiosos” bent on preventing the change Argentine voters chose, saying on the X platform, formerly known as Twitter, that the action would not halt the administration’s progress. Mr. Milei’s spokesperson, Manuel Adorni, said at a news conference, “One cannot dialogue with people who try to stop the country and show a rather antidemocratic side.”

It remained unclear if the strike, scheduled to end at midnight, would amount to a speedbump to his agenda or no obstacle at all.

Mr. Milei’s labor decree would restrict the right to strike by essential workers in hospital services, education, and transport, and create new mechanisms of compensation to make it easier to fire employees. It also would enable workers to pay private healthcare providers directly, rather than channeling those resources through unions, and so dry up a significant source of their revenue.

His administration warned in recent days that, as with a demonstration held in December, protesters would be prevented from engaging in the traditional practice of blocking roads and would be subject to arrest.

The stoppage began at midday, and banks, gas stations, public administration, public health officials, and trash collection were operating on a limited basis. Airports remained open, although state-owned airline Aerolineas Argentinas canceled 267 flights and rescheduled others, disrupting travel plans for more than 17,000 passengers.

Public transportation workers went on strike at 7 p.m. in Buenos Aires and surrounding areas, but had operated normally during the daytime to facilitate protesters’ access to and from the plaza in front of Congress.

By the afternoon, tens of thousands of protesters had flooded in. Héctor Daer, CGT’s secretary general, told the crowd from atop a stage that Mr. Milei’s decree “destroys individual rights of workers, collective rights and seeks to eliminate the possibility of union action at a time in which we have great inequality in society.”

Pablo Moyano, of the teamsters’ union, told them that “if they pass these measures of adjustment, of hunger, then the workers, retirees and the most humble people will put him (Economy Minister Luis Caputo) on their shoulders and throw him in the river.”

Mr. Milei responded to Mr. Moyano’s comment on X: “Never was the choice so clear. We make the changes or we remain prisoners to these extortionists.”

Mr. Milei has said passage of his proposed omnibus bill would create the basis for economic stability and growth, reining in inflation, and reducing poverty, which is punishing four in 10 Argentines. The bill’s content is being discussed in Congress’ lower house, with a vote expected in coming days.

Mr. Berensztein, the analyst, said he expects the bill to be watered down significantly before clearing the house, then move on to the Senate for another round of negotiations.

Benjamin Gedan, director of the Latin America program at the Wilson Center in Washington said that while Mr. Milei is acting as though he has a clear mandate, many of his voters were rejecting Peronism rather than throwing full support behind his proposal for austerity.

Argentines have already been hit with a 30% increase in food costs in a single month, plus a surge in energy bills and transport fares.

“His capacity to keep the Argentine public on board will be tested and is being tested already, and that’s what you’re seeing right now,” Mr. Gedan said, adding the president has “given opponents a lot of weapons because he has moved so quickly and dramatically” to address Argentina’s problems.

Mr. Gedan said a one-day strike is “not an existential threat” for the Milei presidency. “Really the question is if this is a sign of what’s to come.”

This story was reported by The Associated Press. AP writer Natacha Pisarenko in Buenos Aires contributed reporting.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Can Argentina’s workers stop new president’s drive to reshape economy?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Americas/2024/0125/Can-Argentina-s-workers-stop-new-president-s-drive-to-reshape-economy
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe