Bolivia now has even less to lose in sheltering Snowden

The grounding of President Morales's plane on suspicion he was transporting Edward Snowden has garnered anger from allies across Latin America.

Andres Gutierrez/AP
The Bolivian presidential plane believed to be carrying President Evo Morales lands at the Gran Canaria airport in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria island, Spain, Wednesday, June 3. Bolivian officials vigorously rejected rumors that National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden was on board the plane.

Bolivian officials vigorously rejected rumors that National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden was on the same plane as President Evo Morales when the plane was forced to land in Vienna last night after being denied access to French, Portuguese, Italian, and Spanish airspace, according to state news service ABI.

President Morales, who was en route from Moscow to La Paz following an official visit, will now return to Bolivia after nearly 14 hours in Vienna. According to Reuters, officials searched the plane and determined Mr. Snowden was not on board.

"We were informed there were unfounded suspicions that Mr. Snowden would be on the plane," said Bolivia’s Foreign Minister David Choquehuanca at a press conference in La Paz last night. "We don't know who invented this lie. Someone wants to harm our country."

Bolivia's defense minister, Rubén Saavedra, said the US government was behind the grounding of the plane, calling it an act of "threat and intimidation" following Morales's statement Tuesday that he would consider an asylum request from Snowden.

The situation is drawing anger and condemnation from Bolivia and its allies across Latin America, who see this as a breach of diplomatic protocol and a double standard.

“Regardless of what one thinks of Snowden, from the point of view of many Latin American governments, this is imperialism at its worst,” says Coletta Youngers, a senior fellow at the Washington Office on Latin America, in an e-mail.

"A diplomatic plane with a president on board, diverted from its route and then searched – it is precisely the kind of mistreatment that the Bolivian government has rejected in its bilateral relations with the United States," she says. "This would not happen to President Obama’s plane; why should diplomatic protocol be shunned for President Morales?"

This is the latest development in the fraught relationship between Bolivia and The United States. In 2008, Morales accused the US of wielding political influence against his government, and expelled the US ambassador and the Drug Enforcement Agency. This past May the United States Agency for International Development was kicked out of the country as well.

Bolivia is not known as a haven for international asylum seekers, but along with allies like President Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela and Rafael Correa in Ecuador, Morales maintains a strong political discourse against US dominance in the region. As more and more countries deny Snowden's aslyum requests, Bolivia may be rising up the ranks as a country suited to give him refuge.

"Given Snowden’s situation, Bolivia is in many ways a logical choice for him,” says Ms. Youngers. “US-Bolivian relations remain tense, with no exchange of ambassadors in sight, and US economic aid to the country is at an all-time low, so Bolivia has little to lose in taking him in.”

Ecuador, which was previously viewed as a likely destination for Snowden, backed off from early signs of support on Monday when President Correa told the Guardian that issuing Snowden a temporary travel pass when he left Hong Kong “was a mistake on our part."

Youngers says that unlike Ecuador, Bolivia is not likely to be swayed by a call from Vice President Biden or any other US official. "The US government has few policy tools at its disposal to persuade President Morales otherwise,” she says.

And with Morales likely to be in power for the foreseeable future, Snowden does not have to worry about a regime change that could lead to his ouster down the road, Younger says.

Though Morales is now on his way home to La Paz after access to airspace was reopened, fallout over the incident continues as President Ollanta Humala of Peru has been asked to call a special meeting of the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) to discuss the legal ramifications of last night's events.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.