French hostage held by Al Qaeda is freed in Mali after three years

French businessman Serge Lazarevic was released in Mali where he was abducted at a hotel in November 2011. France hasn't commented on the terms of his release, which follows a failed US rescue mission of a US hostage in Yemen. 

Support Committee for Philippe Verdon and Serge Lazarevic/AP/file
French President François Hollande announced Tuesday that Serge Lazarevic, shown here in an undated photo, has been released from kidnappers in Mali.

The last French hostage held by Islamic extremists in Africa has been released after more than three years in captivity, French President François Hollande said Tuesday.

While details of the release remain unclear – including whether or not a ransom was paid – it stands in sharp contrast to the failed US rescue attempt of an American hostage in Yemen on Saturday. American photojournalist Luke Somers died in that raid, along with South African Pierre Korkie. 

Mr. Hollande said in a statement that the former French hostage, Serge Lazarevic, was “relatively healthy, despite the very harsh conditions of his long captivity.”

“We no longer have any hostages in any country of the world, and we should not have any,” Hollande said. He thanked Niger’s president, Mahamadou Issoufou, for helping secure the release of Lazarevic, who is en route to Niger. 

The French businessman was kidnapped by Al Qaeda’s North African branch, Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, from a hotel in central Mali in November 2011 along with a French geologist, Philippe Verdon. The group later killed Mr. Verdon “in retaliation” for a French military operation launched in Mali in January 2013, France 24 reports. 

French authorities repeatedly maintain that they do not pay ransoms to kidnappers. But, as France 24 reports, France and other European countries “are widely known to use intermediaries to pay million-dollar ransoms to militants in exchange for the release of their nationals.”

France has provided $58 million in ransom payments since 2008, the most of any country, according to a New York Times investigation published in July. Other payers include Switzerland and Spain at $12.4 million and $5.9 million, respectively. 

Kidnapping Europeans for ransom has become a global business for Al Qaeda, bankrolling its operations across the globe.

While European governments deny paying ransoms, an investigation by The New York Times found that Al Qaeda and its direct affiliates have taken in at least $125 million in revenue from kidnappings since 2008, of which $66 million was paid just last year.

The United States and Britain have apparently refused to pay any ransoms, arguing that payments to kidnappers only perpetuate a costly and violent cycle.

"Ransom payments lead to future kidnappings, and future kidnappings lead to additional ransom payments. And it all builds the capacity of terrorist organizations to conduct attacks," David Cohen, the undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence at the Treasury Department, said in 2012, according to The Washington Post.

Critics of ransom payments point out that last year there were more French hostages around the world than any other nationality. At one point, Islamic militants in West Africa held at least 14 French nationals, the BBC reports.

The debate over how to secure the release of hostages has intensified this year in the wake of high-profile cases and gruesome beheadings by the self-described Islamic State.  

While the US strongly condemns ransom payments, its preferred method of using special forces to free hostages carries its own risks. The Navy Seals raid in Yemen on Sunday provides the most recent example: The raid not only left American photojournalist Mr. Somers dead but also led to the death of Mr. Korkie, a South African aid worker. 

Korkie’s family and Gift of Givers, the organization he worked for, had arranged for his release by Al Qaeda's Yemen branch on Sunday after months of negotiations. The US has said it wasn't aware that the two men were being held together. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.