Kenyans rejoice at collapse of ICC case against President Kenyatta

Supporters of President Uhuru Kenyatta sang "Uhuru is finally free" across Nairobi on Friday, praising The Hague's decision to end its case against him. But not all Kenyans were happy with the court’s announcement.

Noor Khamis/Reuters
A woman dances with an image of Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta in Nairobi after his case at the International Criminal Court was dropped on Friday.

The International Criminal Court dropped its charges against Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta on Friday, a decision that took six years to make but only moments to ignite exuberant celebrations in the streets of Nairobi.

“It has been a long wait and we are going [to] celebrate until morning,” says Bernard Chege, a local flower vendor who was waiting to close his stall so he could join. “We knew from the beginning he was wrongly accused. This is a big relief and is going to unite the country.”

President Kenyatta faced charges of crimes against humanity in connection with violence that erupted in the aftermath of Kenya’s 2007 election and led to the deaths of more than 1,200 people. The mass crimes listed on the ICC charge sheet include rape, murder, and the forcible transfer of populations.

But on Friday, a prosecutor at The Hague in the Netherlands announced that the evidence in Kenyatta’s case was not enough to prove the president's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, making it one of the court's biggest failures to convict in its 11-year history. The president's supporters have said the faltering case was proof of his innocence, or that the ICC was politically driven and conducted poor investigations.

While many Kenyans have praised the ICC’s decision to drop the charges, Kenyatta’s critics argue that justice has not been delivered. They claim the court faced widespread obstruction from Kenya’s government and that witnesses against Kenyatta were bribed, threatened, or worse, forcing some to recant. 

Kenyatta said that he was “deeply relieved by the decision” in a statement, adding that his conscience was clear.

In Nairobi, hundreds of his supporters took to the streets Friday. Some held signs that proclaimed Kenyatta's innocence. Others could be heard singing, "Uhuru is finally free."

“We’re happy and pray to God that he will protect [Kenyatta’s] leadership,” says Samuel Njoroge, a young motorcyclist near Nairobi's city market. Mr. Njoroge prides himself on the many prayers he and other Kenyans recited for the president during his indictment, including some by traditional elders in a shrine on top of Mt. Kenya.

The general mood on the streets of Nairobi was one of relief after the court's decision.  But some government supporters voiced their concerns for Deputy President William Ruto, who remains under investigation by the ICC for his alleged role in the 2007 election violence.

“I can only be sure of a peaceful Kenya if Ruto’s case is also ended,” says John Miere, a local businessman. “I think we still have a long way to go, since this can easily tear apart the ruling coalition.”

Not all Kenyans welcomed the ICC’s announcement, especially those closely affected by the ethnically fueled violence that start in late 2007 and continued into early 2008.

“This [withdrawal] is not fair,” says Maria Nazra, a local college student. “People died and someone has to be [held] accountable. There should be some kind of punishment for the deaths.”

Mike Odhiambo, a shoe shiner who works outside the Jamia Mosque in downtown Nairobi, strikes a helpless tone when asked about the court's decision.

"I don’t see why I should celebrate,” Mr. Odhiambo says. “I don’t [think] this court will ever give Kenyans justice."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Kenyans rejoice at collapse of ICC case against President Kenyatta
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today