Nelson Mandela assassination plotters face 35 years in prison

White supremacists who tried to murder Mr. Mandela had wanted South Africa to return via a coup to apartheid. Ironically, under that system the plotters would now face the death penalty. 

Members of the right-wing 'Boeremag' await sentencing at Pretoria High Court, October 29, 2013. The mastermind and another member of a white supremacist plot to assassinate Nelson Mandela and drive blacks out of South Africa were sentenced to 35 years in prison on Tuesday. Other defendants received lesser sentences.

Some 21 members of the far-right Boeremag or "Farmer Force" on Tuesday were found guilty of treason by Pretoria's High Court for a foiled 2002 plot to overthrow the fledgling democracy.

Five members of the group who planted bombs in a mosque and in railway stations and petrol stations in the black township of Soweto – one of which killed a woman in her home – were also found guilty of culpable homicide.

The same five men hatched an impromptu plot to kill Nelson Mandela, the country’s first black president who had by then left office but who retained enormous influence, after they heard Mr. Mandela was planning to visit a rural school.

The men planted a bomb in a ditch to the side of a road that Mandela was scheduled to take. The bomb was rigged with fishing line that the men would use to detonate it when the former president passed by. Their plans were thwarted when South Africa's senior statesman (now at home recovering from an ailment) traveled to the engagement by helicopter.

The Boeremag trial began in May 2003 amid tight security in South Africa’s capital.

Some of the defendants, who range between 32 and 74, were doctors, academics, and members of the armed forces. All but one had no previous criminal convictions. Some said during the trial they launched the plot out of a fear of attacks on white farmers. Others cited political reasons. But most denied outright any involvement in criminal or treasonous behavior. 

Those group members who admitted to a role in the plots asked to be tried as soldiers engaged in a legitimate armed struggle, comparing themselves to Mandela and his ANC colleagues who did at times wage a campaign of sabotage against the apartheid government. (Mandela later renounced violence as an answer to injustice.)

Their claim was rejected by the trial judge, Eben Jordaan, who described the plotters as "dishonest liars" who had sacrificed jobs and families and risked consciously plunging the country into "further chaos and bloodshed."

The five who plotted to kill Mandela received the maximum sentence of 35 years. But under South African law they could be freed in 25 years since they have spent almost 10 years on remand as the trial took place. Under the apartheid government, which sanctioned capital punishment, they would have faced execution.

According to local media, some of the families of the Farmer Force gasped and cried as the sentences were read out. One family member reportedly described the plot as “a storm in a teacup.”

The group’s ringleader, Mike du Toit, a former university lecturer, was found with a blueprint for the coup on his computer which described a Boer "Utopia" ruled over by a new military government appointed without democratic elections.

The blueprint suggested driving South Africa's black majority of about 40 million persons to Zimbabwe by lining the roads heading north with food parcels. It suggested sending the country’s 1.2 million Indians back to the South Asian subcontinent by boat, or in another plan, to pretend to make allies of them, and then shoot them once the coup achieved its aims.

Mr. du Toit discussed creating a "trigger" for the coup by blowing up a major dam, or shooting down a Boeing passenger plane to create a "World Trade Center situation." Other plots included assassinating Mandela and cutting electricity to major cities.

However, the group was infiltrated by intelligence agency moles who gave evidence against them at trial. 

Frans Cronje, from South Africa's Institute of Race Relations, says any fears that the Boeremag's plot might win sympathy from disgruntled right-wingers in the country evaporated when their plans became known. 

"It was clear that these guys were a bunch of clowns," he says. 

But he warns that there has been a resurgence of "white, right-wing sympathy" in recent years, which could create new, unspecified threats. "I think years of crime and violence and black economic empowerment policies and a dearth of leadership in Afrikanerdom have allowed a situation to develop where there's a certain degree of bitterness in a certain section of the population."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Nelson Mandela assassination plotters face 35 years in prison
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today