As elephants vanish, Kenya puts Chinese ivory smuggler in prison

Kenyan court's landmark 2-1/2 year sentence is a major shift from the small fines that ivory smugglers have faced in the past.

Vincent Yu/AP
Crates full of illegal ivory are displayed during a press conference in Hong Kong, Wednesday, Aug. 7, 2013.

Days after Kenyan leader Uhuru Kenyatta signed $5 billion in projects with China that included a nod to wildlife preservation, Kenyan courts sentenced a Chinese woman to more than two years in jail for her attempt to smuggle ivory from the East African nation.

The sentence given Chen Beimei is the first of its kind in Kenya, where authorities so far have levied only small fines for ivory smugglers – even while doling out tougher penalties on local poachers who directly kill animals. 

Ms. Chen was arrested Aug. 14 while trying to smuggle pieces of ivory weighing more than 15 pounds in bags that she declared to be containing macadamia nuts. She was apprehended while boarding a Kenyan Airways Flight to Hong Kong from Nairobi, and late last week pleaded guilty to the charges.

Her jail sentence comes as gangs are poaching elephants and rhinos to feed a demand for ivory in the Asian market. China and Thailand are thought to be the biggest consumers, with the items being used for ornaments and medicine.

Kenyan President Kenyatta was in Beijing last week to sign a major deal that will see China build a railroad through Kenya from the Indian Ocean to Uganda.

But China also agreed, according to Kenyatta, to support efforts to stop poaching wildlife and endangered species, even though Beijing has had difficulty curbing the exploitation of endangered species at home.

The ivory issue has become more sensitive as elephant populations decline and a law is being debated in Kenya's parliament to impose prison terms of as many as 15 years or fines of more than $100,000 on those convicted of threatening endangered species.

The Kenyan Wildlife Service reports that in 1979 some 167,000 elephants roamed the savanna, but today the creatures number fewer than 40,000.

Kenyan authorities say that in 2013 so far, some 190 elephants and 35 rhino have been killed by poachers. The rhino population is at a crisis level with only 1,025 remaining in the country, say authorities.

Kenyan Wildlife Service spokesman Paul Udoto said after Chen's sentencing that “This sends the message to other gangs that dealing with ivory in Kenya will be made a high-cost affair and low-profit business. Those engaged in smuggling should be ready to pay heavy losses including long jail terms.”

This year, some 17 smugglers from six nations have been apprehended in Kenya. These include eight Chinese, six Vietnamese, and one each from the United States, Tanzania, and South Sudan. In March, a Chinese man was set free by the courts after being fined $350 for illegally holding some 400 pieces of ivory.

It is not clear if Asian or Chinese smugglers are paying the poachers upfront, but what is clear is that Asia and China are the destination point for the ivory and rhino horns.

On Aug. 22, the day Chen was incarcerated, Kenya’s Ministry of Environment, Water and Natural Resources issued a statement saying the trade in wildlife and its products posed a “major challenge.”

Poaching and wildlife trafficking are “more organized,” lucrative, and widespread, and are “undermining” Kenya’s effort to preserve its wild creatures, according to Judi Wakhungu, cabinet secretary for the ministry.

Speaking in Beijing last week, Kenyatta told reporters, “The Chinese government understands that poaching is a problem. The most important thing is that they are not just talking about it but working to solve it.”

Kenyatta’s office later issued a statement that China will help improve surveillance around national parks and game reserves and aid Kenya in adding to the ranks of the current 3,000 wildlife rangers who deal with poachers – with further details to come. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.