Will Bashir's visit help close the divide between the Sudans?

On Friday Sudanese President Omar Al Bashir visited South Sudan for the first time since the two countries split in 2011. Experts say it's a sign that relations between the Sudans are finally stabilizing.

Andreea Campeanu/Reuters
Sudan's President Omar Hassan al-Bashir (l.) and his South Sudan counterpart Salva Kiir address a joint news conference in Juba South Sudan Friday. President al-Bashir said on Friday he wanted peace and normal relations with South Sudan in his first visit there since it split off from his country in 2011 after decades of civil war.

Sudanese President Omar Al Bashir visited South Sudan for the first time on Friday, nearly two years after the South became an independent state that Mr. Bashir pledged to have normal relations with.

Arriving in Juba, the capital of South Sudan, Bashir appeared to affirm that pledge, saying the two countries are ripe for peace, and ordering all Sudan’s borders opened to “South Sudan brothers," according to media reports. 

Since Sudan split on July 9, 2011, the two former adversaries – who fought a 21-year civil war – have been trapped in continued bitter disputes over oil exports, border lines, and commercial rights in business and industry.

Last year the two nations reached the brink of war during a dispute over Hegling, a major oil producing area along one border.

In Juba today South Sudan’s President Salva Kiir said the two heads of states agreed to continue implementing cooperation agreements signed in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa in September last year, according to the Sudan Catholic Radio Network. The agreements, of which there are nine, are efforts to peacefully resolve a host of issues that spilled over from the secession of the South.

The two leaders also plan to address territorial conflicts along their volatile 1,200-mile common border, where thousands have been displaced in the last two years.

Barnaba Marial Benjamin, South Sudan's information minister, described the visit as a sign that Juba and Khartoum are geared towards warmer relations after months of tension caused by the unresolved issues.

Since March, tensions have eased following an agreement to resume oil exports from South Sudan through Sudan’s pipeline to Port Sudan in the Red Sea.

“This is a sign that the two countries have realized they need each other," says Fred Nyabera, a Nairobi-based regional peace building and conflict resolution expert who was involved in Sudanese peace process. "The cuttings of oil export, for example, have not benefited either side. I think such visit illustrates normalizing of the situation. I think this is good for the two countries,” 

“We hope they can build trust,” says Joseph Atem Bul, a Sudanese student in Nairobi, indicating that remains the biggest obstacle between two sides. 

Ahead of the visit security was tightened in Juba, with some roads being closed and movement on some streets restricted.

Schools, government institutions, shops, international organizations, and offices were closed to allow throngs to congregate and cheer Bashir, though he received a mixed welcome as many South Sudanese hold him responsible for the deaths of family during the civil war.   

The last time Bashir set foot in South Sudan was in 2011 during the nation's declaration of independence.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.