Aid workers, civilians flee as rebels take key DR Congo city

Rebels took control of Goma, the main city in the east of DR Congo. Congo's government has said it will not negotiate with them, raising fears of renewed fighting.

James Akena/Reuters
Congolese Revolution Army (CRA) rebels drive in trucks as they patrol a street in Goma in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Tuesday, soon after the rebels captured the city from the government army. Goma fell to the M23 rebels after Congo’s government Army deserted the city, which is home to more than 1 million people and host to hundreds of charities and a large United Nations base.

Tens of thousands of civilians were fleeing and international aid workers evacuating Tuesday as a rebel army in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo took control of the main city in the country’s east. 

Goma fell to the M23 rebels after Congo’s government Army deserted the city, which is home to more than 1 million people and host to hundreds of charities and a large United Nations base. The rebels had swept south from the forested hills to the north and, during five days of fighting, won control of town after town on the road into Goma. 

“There was a lot of noise of fighting in the north of the city early this morning, but then it stopped, and just some two hours later, I saw the rebels marching past my house,” says Joachim Kabori, a travel agent in Goma. “They are not being aggressive, they are disciplined. Many people are welcoming them, and they truly control Goma now. There is no representative left here of the government or the FARDC [Congo’s Army].” 

Congo’s government in the capital, Kinshasa, more than 1,000 miles to the east, vowed that it would not negotiate with the M23, raising fears that it will order its troops back to regain the city, leading to civilian casualties. 

The rebel movement is made up of as many as 2,000 troops who deserted Congo’s national Army in April, claiming that they were not being paid properly and their officers were not being promoted. Those were promises made in a 2009 peace deal that ended an earlier rebellion by many of the same soldiers, mostly from the Tutsi tribe that claims it is marginalized in both politics and military strategy in Congo’s east. 

Goma was last threatened in 2008, by another mostly Tutsi movement called the CNDP, whose troops and commanders now largely make up the ranks of the M23.

The mutineers, led by Bosco Ntaganda, wanted for alleged war crimes by the International Criminal Court, fled into the countryside north of Goma along Congo’s border with Rwanda, and began fighting to wrest control of territory from the government. 

It appears that their aim is to hold this territory as bargaining chips ahead of a new round of peace negotiations, when they will demand that the conditions of the 2009 peace agreement be honored. There have been repeated claims, however, that they earn significant income from mines in the areas that they now control, meaning that they would be unlikely fully to surrender. 

Who will help internally displaced people?

During the past several days of fighting, more than 50,000 people fled rural areas north of Goma into the city and to open fields to its west. Most international aid workers have been evacuated into neighboring Rwanda, and the charities’ local staff are sheltering at home, raising fears for continued efforts to help the internally displaced people. 

The world’s largest United Nations peacekeeping mission, known as Monusco, is based in Congo, but its mandate does not extend to stopping the rebels' advance, and its troops stood by as they entered Goma. 

A report to the UN Security Council in October accused Rwanda and Uganda, which also neighbors Congo, of arming and financing the rebels, a charge that both countries have strongly denied. 

Rwanda claimed on Monday that Congolese troops shelled its territory, raising fears that the conflict could escalate across their shared border. 

When Rwanda and Uganda invaded their giant neighbor in 1996, it sparked a decade of conflict in Central Africa that left as many as 5 million people dead, mostly from hunger and disease. Rwanda’s foreign minister, Louisa Mushikiwabo, said on Tuesday that her country would “not rise to the provocation” from Congo, which she accused of “dangerous game-playing.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.