Charles III’s challenge: Keep Britain’s monarchy relevant

|
Victoria Jones/AP
Lord Carrington, Lord Great Chamberlain, presents the spurs to King Charles III during the coronation of King Charles III and Camilla, the queen consort, at Westminster Abbey, in London, May 6, 2023. The first of the regalia presented to the king, the spurs date from the coronation of King Charles II in 1661.
  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 4 Min. )

Last weekend’s coronation of King Charles III was an affair steeped in history. But it carried a very contemporary political message, not just for Britain but also for other democracies, like the United States, strained by increasingly angry political, economic, and social divisions.

The coronation was a reminder of the importance of institutions that are able to stand above that fray, standing instead for a shared understanding of history that provides ballast and stability, to offer a focal point not for what is pulling people apart, but for what they have in common.

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

The apparently anachronistic pomp and pageantry of King Charles III’s coronation carried a contemporary message: the importance of an institution that can stand above the political fray.

But it is in defining the nature of the monarch’s political role – embodying an overarching unity of purpose, especially at a time of partisanship and waning trust in government institutions – that Charles may find his greatest difficulty.

As heir to the throne, he was never shy of voicing his opinions. But to continue to do so would risk tension with Britain’s elected leaders.

It could also court disaster. The king’s new crown has raised the stakes considerably, demanding that Charles III stand above the rancor and division of day-to-day politics. For if he were to allow the monarchy to become just another political institution, its glitter would be reduced to glitz.

Britain’s Royal Collection catalog calls them, simply, “The Spurs.”

Yet nothing about last weekend’s coronation of King Charles III could be described as simple.

These particular spurs – gold, with velvet-cloaked leather – were the first of the regalia presented to the king just before he was crowned under the majestic medieval roof of Westminster Abbey. And like the crown itself, they dated from the coronation of the last English king to be named Charles: Charles II, over three-and-a-half centuries ago, in 1661.

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

The apparently anachronistic pomp and pageantry of King Charles III’s coronation carried a contemporary message: the importance of an institution that can stand above the political fray.

They formed a small, yet indispensable part of a meticulously choreographed celebration embracing its roots in England’s history and established church, and bookmarked by public spectacle complete with gilded carriages and serried ranks of lock-stepped soldiery.

But the coronation, and the thousands of community events organized around it nationwide, also carried a very contemporary political message, not just for Britain but also for other democracies, like the United States, strained by increasingly angry political, economic, and social divisions.

Vadim Ghirda/AP
Britain's King Charles III and Queen Camilla travel back to Buckingham Palace after his coronation ceremony in London, May 6, 2023.

It was a reminder of the importance of institutions that are able to stand above that fray, standing instead for a shared understanding of history that provides ballast and stability, to offer a focal point not for what is pulling people apart, but for what they have in common.

And as King Charles III is keenly aware, it was a reminder of the delicate task he now faces in retaining that role for the monarchy – an issue that had faded in importance amid the popular affection built up by his mother, Queen Elizabeth II, during her seven decades on the throne.

Charles’ challenge is to modernize the monarchy. But not modernize it too much.

The pull in both directions was evident over the coronation weekend.

The Abbey service was steeped in tradition: The king was anointed with oil, drawing his authority from God, not voters, and pledging his loyalty to the established church. But aware that only 2% of the British population still regularly attends Church of England services, and that most of his subjects are not Christians, he included representatives of other faiths as well in the service.

In a reflection of the need to forge a bond of his own with Britons, he opened proceedings by declaring, “I come not to be served, but to serve.”

And the congregation included representatives of charities and community groups, a recognition that while the monarchy enjoys huge wealth and privilege, millions are struggling to cope with double-digit inflation, housing shortages, and creaking public services.

Toby Melville/Reuters
People watch a screening of the concert marking Britain's King Charles' coronation, near Windsor Castle, Windsor, England, May 7, 2023.

Still, despite recent polls suggesting an erosion of support for the monarchy, the coronation weekend left little doubt that there is still broad support for the institution – not so much in spite of its remoteness from the realities of everyday life and everyday politics, but because of this.

Tens of thousands thronged into central London on coronation day. More than 20 million watched on television. Family celebrations, pub get-togethers, street parties, and volunteer events were held across the country in the two days that followed. They were punctuated by chants of “God Save the King” – some full-throated, some self-conscious, some no doubt ironic, but all part of a convergence that is increasingly rare in Britain, as elsewhere in the world.

Still, it is in defining the nature of the monarch’s political role – embodying an overarching unity of purpose, especially at a time of partisanship and waning trust in government institutions – that King Charles III may find his greatest difficulty.

That’s because a large part of his new job is essentially to follow a script.

He is head of state. But in day-to-day terms, that’s a fiction. The monarch ostensibly invites a party leader to form a government after a national election, but the choice has been made by the voters. The King’s speech, opening Parliament with a run-down of legislative plans, is delivered by the monarch as well. “My government,” he says, will do this or that. But his words are written by the prime minister.

Leon Neal/AP
Britain's King Charles III and Queen Camilla look at each other as they stand on the balcony of the Buckingham Palace after their coronation, in London, May 6, 2023.

And here’s the main challenge for Charles: in those moments when he does speak in his own voice, he will need to steer clear of politics, choosing themes and words that resonate equally with right and left, young and old, poor and privileged.

His late mother did this without fail, from the time she became queen in her early 20s, and perhaps never more powerfully and eloquently than during the pandemic.

As heir, however, Charles spent one of the world’s longest apprenticeships expressing strong opinions on all sorts of things, from architecture and agriculture to religion and refugee policy.

To continue to do so would risk tension with Britain’s elected leaders – as he well knows, since over the years government ministers have on numerous occasions appealed quietly to him to stay out of partisan political debates.

It could also court disaster. The king’s crown has raised the stakes considerably, demanding that Charles III stand above the rancor and division of day-to-day politics. For if he were to allow the monarchy to become just another political institution, its glitter would be reduced to glitz.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Charles III’s challenge: Keep Britain’s monarchy relevant
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/2023/0511/Charles-III-s-challenge-Keep-Britain-s-monarchy-relevant
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe