Meanwhile in … the Cook Islands, the country is thinking about a name change.

And in the southern highlands of Mars, scientists confirmed the existence of a system of liquid water that once flowed on the red planet.

SERGI REBOREDO/PICTURE-ALLIANCE/DPA/AP
POLYNESIAN MUSICIANS PERFORM IN THE COOK ISLANDS.

In the Cook Islands, the country is thinking about a name change. The Cook Islands are currently named after the English explorer Captain James Cook, who encountered the islands in 1773. But a growing movement seeks to change that by finding a Maori-language name for the islands to honor the heritage of their indigenous peoples. More than 60 possibilities have been submitted to a newly created name change committee, which hopes to have a shortlist by April. (The Guardian)

In cyberspace, Rotten Tomatoes stopped trolls from review-bombing movies. The popular movie review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes used to allow site users to rate movies before they were released. Sometimes, however, this feature allowed large numbers of internet trolls to “bomb” movie scores by piling on negative ratings without having seen the movie first. (That practice was usually employed when a movie’s lead characters were played by women or people of color.) To keep audience scores useful and constructive, the site turned off pre-release ratings while continuing to count the number of people who say they are interested in seeing movies. (The Washington Post)

In the southern highlands of Mars, scientists confirmed the existence of a system of liquid water that once flowed on the red planet. Researchers used information from the European Space Agency’s Mars Express mission to identify a system of underground, interconnected lakes. The researchers’ findings support predictions of water systems from earlier computer modeling. The lakes would have existed 3 billion to 4 billion years ago, when Mars’ atmosphere was thicker and could trap water on the planet’s surface. (The Independent)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.