New online tool helps seafood companies fight slavery

Media reports of slavery in the fishing and seafood processing industries have prompted the creation of an online tool that allows companies to asses the likelihood of human rights violations throughout their supply chains.

Athit Perawongmetha/Reuters
Migrant workers sort fish and seafood unloaded from a fishing ship at a port in Samut Sakhon province in Thailand on Jan. 22. Reports of slavery in the fishing and seafood processing industries in Thailand prompted the need for The Seafood Slavery Risk Tool.

A new online tool helps seafood companies assess the risk of forced labor or human trafficking in their supply chains, the developers at the Monterey Bay Aquarium in California have said.

The Seafood Slavery Risk Tool provides a database that can be searched by fishery or country. It then gives a risk rating, which indicates the likelihood of human rights violations.

"The tool is meant to provide an easy starting point for thorough due diligence by those businesses," Sara McDonald, a senior fisheries scientist with the aquarium's Seafood Watch program, told the Thomson Reuters Foundation by email.

She said media reports of slavery in the fishing and seafood processing industries had shown the need for such a tool.

Many of those reports focused on Thailand's multibillion-dollar seafood sector, which came under scrutiny after investigations showed widespread slavery, trafficking, and violence on fishing boats and in onshore processing facilities.

The military, which has held power since a 2014 coup, rolled out some reforms after the European Union in 2015 threatened to ban fish imports from Thailand unless it cleaned up the industry.

However, a Human Rights Watch report released last month concluded Thailand had "not taken the steps necessary to end forced labor and other serious abuses on fishing boats."

Exploitation also persists in other fisheries worldwide.

After abuses at sea became public knowledge, Ms. McDonald said "business partners" of the Seafood Watch program – which helps determine if seafood has been produced in an environmentally responsible way – began asking for more information.

"It became evident that publicly available resources to help identify the risks in supply chains weren't available."

To fill that gap, her group partnered with the Hong Kong-based anti-slavery charity Liberty Asia, the Honolulu-based Sustainable Fisheries Partnership, a non-profit group that helps to rebuild depleted fish stocks, and Seafish, a public body founded to improve standards in Britain's fisheries.

Over two years, they developed the Seafood Slavery Risk Tool, with help from agencies including the United Nations International Labour Organization, the environmental activist group Greenpeace and the United States State Department.

The tool went live on Feb. 1.

In addition to providing information, McDonald said the website should encourage companies to ask questions of their suppliers, which could encourage them to stop abuses.

"We hope the tool will lead to long-term changes to practices in the industry so that seafood that is free of forced labor, human trafficking, and hazardous child labor becomes the norm," she said.

This story was reported by Thomson Reuters Foundation.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to New online tool helps seafood companies fight slavery
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today