Close brush between US, Chinese planes in South China Sea 'unsafe,' says Navy

The US Navy believes the incident was 'inadvertent,' but such encounters raise concerns amid mounting tensions in the South China Sea.

Mark Schiefelbein/AP/File
A KJ-200 airborne early warning and control plane (l.), a Y-8J radar plane (c.), and a Y-9JB radar plane (r.), fly in formation during a parade commemorating the 70th anniversary of Japan's surrender during World War II in Beijing., Sept. 3, 2015. The US Pacific Command says a Chinese aircraft and a US Navy patrol plane had an 'unsafe' encounter over the South China Sea this week.

US and Chinese military planes flew dangerously close to one other this week near a disputed shoal in the South China Sea, in an incident that a Navy official described as unsafe but inadvertent.

The official, speaking on condition of anonymity to Reuters, said the planes passed within 1,000 feet of each other as they flew near the Scarborough Shoal, where China and the Philippines have scuffled in recent years over administration and fishing rights.

Such incidents between US and Chinese aircraft are rare, the source added. But it returns attention to the long list of close encounters and mini-provocations involving China, the United States, and US allies in the region, at a time when relations between the two behemoths have become less amicable and predictable than in recent years.

Ministries from both China and the US acknowledged the close fly-by in official statements. "On Feb. 8, an interaction characterized by U.S. Pacific Command as 'unsafe' occurred in international air space above the South China Sea, between a Chinese KJ-200 aircraft and a U.S. Navy P-3C aircraft," US Pacific Command told Reuters. 

"The Department of Defense and U.S. Pacific Command are always concerned about unsafe interactions with Chinese military forces," it added.

"We will address the issue in appropriate diplomatic and military channels." 

China’s defense ministry defended the Chinese pilot’s conduct in an interview with state media, saying the pilot had taken "legal and professional measures."

"We hope the U.S. side keeps in mind the present condition of relations between the two countries and militaries, adopts practical measures, and eliminates the origin of air and sea mishaps between the two countries," an unnamed defense official told the Global Times.

The Scarborough Shoal is in many ways the center of South China Sea tensions. The shoal was US territory during the Philippines’s period as an American colony and passed over into Philippine control upon independence in 1946. The US maintained a military base on a nearby island until 1991 and carried out joint exercises on the shoal with the Philippines. 

In a 2012 standoff with the Philippine Navy, China established effective control over the shoal. It has since allowed Filipino fisherman to work the waters around it. But China’s decision to ignore a United Nations tribunal’s ruling on its South China Sea claims – combined with its building of artificial islands and military installations in the nearby Spratly archipelago – has led many to suspect that it ultimately has its eye on the shoal as a military outpost.

"Because of its position, another military outpost at Scarborough Shoal is seen as the last major physical step required to secure control of the sea," notes the Agence France-Press.

"An outpost at the shoal would also put Chinese fighter jets and missiles within easy striking distance of US forces stationed in the Philippines." 

"The shoal also commands the northeast exit of the sea, so a Chinese military outpost there could stop other countries' navies from using the vital stretch of waters."

News of the close fly-by comes as President Trump seems to have changed tack on the “one China” policy, telling Chinese leader Xi Jinping that the US would honor it during a lengthy phone call on Thursday night. Mr. Trump had shocked Beijing by accepting a congratulatory phone call from Taiwan’s president and previously saying the US had no obligation to abide by the policy.

This report contains material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.