Citing 'fake news,' Ban Ki Moon ends presidential bid in South Korea

Mr. Ban had been considered the only major prospective conservative contender in the possible presidential election since the South Korean Parliament impeached President Park Geun-hye amid a massive corruption scandal last December.

Son Hyung-ju/News1/Reuters
Former UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon bows during a news conference at the National Assembly in Seoul, South Korea, on February 1, 2017.

In a surprising announcement, former UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon dropped his presidential bid in his home country of South Korea on Wednesday, blaming “fake news” and political slander.

Mr. Ban had been considered the only major prospective conservative contender in the possible presidential election since the Parliament impeached President Park Geun-hye amid a massive corruption scandal in December. Ban’s withdrawal gave liberal candidate Moon Jae-in an unexpected boost.

At a hastily arranged news conference at the National Assembly, Ban said he had hoped to use his 10 years of experience working at the United Nations to “achieve a change in politics” and “unify the country.”

“For the past three weeks, I have devoted everything I had, but my genuine patriotism and passion were damaged by rumors and fake news,” he said after meeting with leaders of three political parties, according to The Washington Post.

This unexpected move also comes as Ms. Park goes on trial at the Constitutional Court, facing a decision that could either confirm her impeachment or restore her back to power. If she is removed, presidential elections, which were initially scheduled for December, will be held within two months.

Moon, the front-runner of the progressive People's Party and a former human rights lawyer, said he was caught off guard by Ban’s decision, but said he is willing to seek Ban’s advice on international affairs.

“Ban's experience in foreign policy and international politics should be actively used for our country,” he told reporters.

Despite high anticipation about Ban’s presidency run when he returned to his country on Jan. 12 – with a hero’s welcome that was broadcast live on television – he has faced growing scrutiny from the media over his political competence and corruption allegations, while seeing his popularity further decline in opinion surveys.

While his approval ratings regularly came in at the top of the polls, they have been steadily declining since October, falling to 13 percent, about 20 points behind Moon.

On Jan. 18, struggling to defuse media criticism on his reform plans, Ban used an insulting Korean term to describe journalists as they questioned his ties with the current president. In 2015, he supported Park’s controversial deal with Japan over the “comfort women” issue, referring to Korean women forced to serve as sex slaves for Japanese troops during World War II. Last year, he met with Park several times, which some Koreans considered a sign that they were preparing a secret handover plan.

Amid the conservative party’s current tumultuous scandal, Ban was also forced to defend himself as two of his relatives were indicted on charges of plotting bribery in the United States. He denied any knowledge of the alleged criminal activities. He also repeatedly denied the media’s allegations that he received bribes while serving as the foreign minister, a corruption scandal that led to the suicide of former President Roh Moo-hyun in 2009.

"I was also very disappointed by old-fashioned, narrow-minded egoistic attitudes by some politicians, and I came to a conclusion that it would be meaningless to work together with them," he said.

Ban is not the first UN chief to turn his back on elected politics after leaving the world organization. Neither Boutros Boutros-Ghali nor Ghana’s Kofi Annan chose to run for office in their respective countries.

This report includes material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Citing 'fake news,' Ban Ki Moon ends presidential bid in South Korea
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today