French investigators interview presidential candidate Fillon and wife

France's financial prosecutor opened a preliminary embezzlement and misappropriation of public funds probe of French presidential hopeful Francois Fillon last week.

REUTERS/Pascal Rossignol
Francois Fillon, member of Les Republicains political party and 2017 presidential candidate of the French centre-right, and his wife Penelope attend a political rally in Paris, France, January 29, 2017. Picture taken January 29, 2017.

Leading French presidential hopeful Francois Fillon and his wife, Penelope, were questioned Monday in an embezzlement probe centered on whether she actually worked while being paid as her husband's parliamentary aide.

Francois Fillon, the candidate of the conservative Republicans party, said in a statement afterward that he and Penelope "provided elements useful for showing the truth so as to establish what work was carried out by Madame Fillon."
He did not comment further.
A source close to the investigation confirmed the questioning earlier Monday but refused to say what was discussed or where the meetings with investigators took place.
France's financial prosecutor opened a preliminary embezzlement and misappropriation of public funds probe of Fillon last week.

The investigation followed a report by Le Canard Enchaine newspaper that Fillon's wife was paid a total of about 500,000 euros ($537,000) for work she did not perform.
Fillon says her job "was real."
It's not illegal for French lawmakers to hire their relatives as long as they are genuinely employed.
The allegations have been a major blow to Fillon, whom polls had favored ahead of the April-May presidential election.
At a campaign rally on Sunday in Paris, where a boisterous crowd gave Penelope Fillon a standing ovation and chanted her name, Fillon said, "We have nothing to hide."
"Through Penelope they are trying to break me," he said. "I will never forgive those who chose to throw us to the wolves."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.