Why is FIFA expanding to a 48-team World Cup?

The World Cup will jump from 32 teams to 48 by 2026, according to a plan approved unanimously by the governing council of FIFA.

|
Ennio Leanza/Keystone via AP
Gianni Infantino, FIFA President, speaks after the FIFA Council meeting at the Home of FIFA in Zurich, Switzerland, on Tuesday, Jan. 10, 2017.

For soccer fans who can’t get enough of the World Cup, FIFA could have some good news.

The organization will expand the number of teams eligible for the World Cup from 32 to 48, a decision that passed unanimously in a vote Tuesday. The change, which will be the largest single addition to the slew of competitors in FIFA’s history, is slated to come into effect in time for the 2026 World Cup. The addition will shift the month-long event’s structure, likely adding more matchups to the tournament.

FIFA has 211 teams under its umbrella, but the vast majority never come close to qualifying for its signature event. By adding an additional 16 slots, more mid-level organizations could compete alongside the recurring household names, including those from rarely represented regions, such as Oceania and Africa.

Currently, eligible teams are organized into four groups of eight that play concurrently in an initial round. From there, the top two contenders move onto the final 16, when the cup shifts to a straight knockout format.

An expanded version of the tournament would likely feature 16 groups of three teams each, with the top two from each group in the first round moving on to a 32-team knockout phase. That would likely boost the number of games from 64 to 80, but the cup’s champion would still only play seven games throughout the tournament.

Many parties, including smaller nations for which the competition has historically remained out of reach, were overwhelmingly in favor of the move and applauded a change that will increase participation and bring more diverse teams into the fold. But some remain skeptical of the change, worrying that increased play and an easier qualifying round could hamper the quality of the game in the long run.

Others have decried the plan as a money grab by an organization just re-emerging from a series of financial missteps. Gianni Infantino, the new head of FIFA, proposed the change as he campaigned to replace Sepp Blatter, who left FIFA in 2015 following a scandal that led to the arrests of several high-ranking members.  

FIFA estimates that the expansion could add $1 billion in television, sponsorship, and ticketing revenue during the first phase of the tournament alone, but will also place a burden on host nations, which will have to accommodate an additional 16 teams, and it could place a strain on some of the world’s top players by making their schedules more rigorous.  

"We fail to see the merits to changing the current format of 32 that has proven to be the perfect formula from all perspectives," the European Club Association, which represents some 200 European clubs, said in a statement.

New FIFA Now, a group that has campaigned for reform of the organization, also remained critical, saying that strong teams will now easily qualify for the tournament, ridding the cup of a certain suspense and making the initial games more of a formality for some teams.

"It will not help development of the game or provide improved competitive opportunities for lower-ranked nations," it said in a statement. "Instead, it will make a mockery of the qualification process for most confederations."

The two upcoming World Cups, in 2018 in Russia and 2022 in Qatar, will be played in the current format.

This report contains material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why is FIFA expanding to a 48-team World Cup?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/2017/0110/Why-is-FIFA-expanding-to-a-48-team-World-Cup
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe