EU, Canada sign landmark trade deal

The treaty, which was years in the making, was nearly upended until a last-minute deal was struck to ease concerns from Belgium's Wallonia region that the trade deal would give too much power to multinational corporations.

Thierry Monasse/AP
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau (l.) participates in a media conference with European Council President Donald Tusk, center, and European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker (r.) during an EU-Canada summit at the European Council building in Brussels, Sunday.

Canada and the European Union (EU) signed a landmark trade deal Sunday following years of negotiation and some last-minute hiccups.

The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) is expected to remove some 99 percent of tariffs between the two entities, boosting Canada’s economy by $9 billion a year and the EU’s by $13 billion.

While the deal is being hailed as a triumph of a new form of globalization by some, as well as a foundation for the floundering Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership between the EU and the United States, critics are concerned by possible implications for the environment and other public policy matters.

“The signing of CETA is a historic occasion,” said Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. “This modern and progressive agreement will reinforce the strong links between Canada and the EU, and create vast new opportunities for Canadians and Europeans alike.”

Donald Tusk, president of the European Council, was equally effusive, extolling the agreement in a Twitter post.

Work on the deal began in 2009, and the text was finalized two years ago, but it struggled to acquire the necessary endorsement. To approve such an agreement, the EU needs unanimous assent among its 28 member states.

Belgium also requires endorsement from all of its regions before it can agree to any such EU deal, and it was this criterion that threatened to stop CETA in its tracks at the final moment. Wallonia, a predominantly French-speaking area of Belgium with a population accounting for less than one percent of the EU’s total, refused to sign on until a breakthrough agreement on Thursday.

Yet the concerns raised by Wallonia – that CETA would undermine local standards on labor, the environment, and consumer protection, as well as allowing multinational companies to override smaller organizations and influence public policy – are not unique to that small corner of Belgium.

As EU and Canadian leaders signed the deal in Brussels, about 250 protesters gathered outside, blocking the front entrance and smearing red paint on the building; some even gained access to the foyer.

Proponents of the deal argue that critics’ concerns are without foundation. The European Commissioner for Trade, Cecilia Malmström, for example, cited “the most ambitious sustainable development chapter ever negotiated, making clear commitments on social and environmental issues.”

In her blog post, Ms. Malmström also sought to address widespread dissatisfaction with globalization in general, saying that, instead of attempting to retreat into isolationism, we should seek to shape the future in a more sustainable manner.

“We … have two options,” wrote Malmström. “We can take an easier path and pretend that we can reverse the tide of globalisation, closing our doors to the world. Or we can take the more difficult path and try to shape globalisation according to our vision, while having honest and difficult conversations at home.”

CETA’s passage faces one last hurdle: Full implementation can only come into effect following clearance by more than 35 national and regional parliaments. But Sunday’s breakthrough should allow some 98 percent of the deal’s measures to take hold early next year in the form of a provisional arrangement.

This report contains material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to EU, Canada sign landmark trade deal
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today