UK job market improves. No 'Brexit' effect?

Britain's unemployment rate has actually decreased, but some economists say it's no cause to celebrate. 

Neil Hall/Reuters
A man walks past job advertisements in the window of a recruitment office in central London, February 2014. Britain's unemployment rate changed little from a year ago, dispelling "Brexit effect" predictions.

After Britain voted in June to leave the European Union, economists feared a “Brexit effect.” The jobless rate would increase, as corporations moved to mainland Europe or Ireland.

Nearly three months after the referendum, the roaring unemployment some economists predicted has been just a purr. In fact, the unemployment rate has improved, and a historic three quarters of Britons who can work have jobs, according to a survey the British Office for National Statistics (ONS) released Wednesday.

The country’s unemployment rate for May to July fell 0.6 percent from a year ago, from 5.5 percent to 4.9 percent, according to ONS. The employment rate was 74.5 percent for those three months, with 559,000 more Britons employed than a year ago.

The survey has upset dire forecasts about the immediate blowbacks of Brexit. But economists are divided over what this means in the long run. Some argue the survey contains other indications the worst is yet to come, such as the slowdown in wage growth. Others say it shows the resiliency of the British economy.

“Clearly there are risks that this is the calm before the storm. But, for now, there don’t seem to be any storm clouds on the horizon,” Alan Clarke, an economist at Scotia Bank, told The Guardian. “It is business as usual after the referendum. Firms have not stopped hiring. Blaming the slower wage numbers on Brexit is putting the cart before the horse because the wage data lags [other measures of the economy’s health] by a considerable margin.”

Because the survey was conducted from May to July, it carries just one month of data following Britain’s referendum on the EU June 23. ONS interviewed 40,000 households for the survey it performs every three months.

Britain is the second largest economy in Europe, and the fifth largest in the world, as measured by its gross domestic product.

Some of the results of ONS’s Labour Force Survey are good news. The employment and unemployment rates show jobs were “resilient” after the referendum, analysts told BBC. It also boosted the pound 0.13 percent, as it rebounded from a two-week low Tuesday, following the release of UK inflation data, according to The Telegraph.

But some economists said it’s no cause for celebration. They pointed to the slowdown in wage growth. Wage growth decreased (including bonuses) from 2.5 percent to 2.3 percent.

Others critics say the boost in employment is deceptive.

“When you scratch beneath the surface, today’s labor market figures are not as robust as they first appear,” Samuel Tombs, chief British economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, told BBC. The rise in people in work “remains supported by surging self-employment … the strong growth also reflected a shift towards part-time working; total weekly hours rose by just 0.3 percent between April and July.”

While the results of the survey are mixed, it counters one firm’s analysis in July of a coming “Brexit effect,” as reported by Max Lewontin for The Christian Science Monitor.

A closely watched indicator of the country’s economic health known as the purchasing manager’s index (PMI), produced by the research firm IHS Markit, dropped to 47.7 percent. That’s the lowest level since April 2009, when Britain was in the throes of the global financial crisis, the firm says.

"The only other times we have seen this index fall to these low levels, was the global financial crisis in 2008/9, the bursting of the dot-com bubble, and the 1998 Asian financial crisis," Chris Williamson, chief economist at IHS Markit, told the BBC. "The difference this time is that it is entirely home-grown, which suggest the impact could be greater on the UK economy than before.”

Both manufacturing and the service sector, which includes businesses such as transportation, restaurants, and computing and makes up nearly 80 percent of Britain’s economy, saw notable declines in the PMI survey, the Financial Times reports.

When British telecom giant Vodafone announced in late June it was considering moving its headquarters out of its home country, other economists predicted other companies would follow.

“It will be more a movement on the margins than big, discreet changes,” Thomas Sampson, a professor at the London School of Economics (LSE) who specializes in international trade, growth, and development, told The Christian Science Monitor. “We might see some companies like Vodafone relocating their headquarters. We might see others investing less in the UK,” he added, mentioning, as an example, a financial firm relocating jobs from London to Paris, Frankfurt, or other cities in the Eurozone.

But a BBC economic editor says the latest survey results could also show the government is pushing public employees on to the private sector.

"Yes, employment is at record levels, but it is the private sector that is on the up," wrote BBC editor Kamal Ahmed. Public employment is down to 5.33 million, the lowest level since ONS started collecting figures in 1999.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to UK job market improves. No 'Brexit' effect?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today