In Egypt vote, ultraconservative Islamists try balancing act

Egypt's Al-Nour Party leaders hardly referred to religion at a recent rally, a dramatic change for a party that was once one of the strongest advocates for Islamic Shariah law.

AP Photo/Eman Helal
In this Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2015 photo, an Egyptian woman attends a campaign rally for the Al-Nour party in Alexandria, Egypt, ahead of Egyptian parliamentary elections that start later this month. Two years after supporting the army’s overthrow of an elected Islamist president, Mohammed Morsi, Al-Nour is attempting a delicate balancing act: maintaining their appeal to an ultraconservative base either disillusioned with politics or disgusted by the party’s past conduct, while reaching out to the political center on promises to unify and rebuild a polarized country.

Beards without moustaches, the trademark of ultraconservative Islamists, were all the rage at this campaign rally, among both speakers and the men in the audience, while women wearing full-face veils sat on a separate side of a multicolored tent.

Yet the parliament candidates from Egypt's Al-Nour Party giving speeches at the rally hardly referred to religion, a dramatic change for a party that was once one of the strongest advocates for a greater role of Islam in government and society.

In Egypt's first democratic elections in 2012, held after its Arab Spring uprising, Al-Nour won the second largest number of parliamentary seats after the more mainstream Muslim Brotherhood, and for a while it was its close ally. But in 2013, the party backed the army's overthrow of the Brotherhood's Mohammed Morsi, an Islamist who was the country's first freely elected president.

Now, for parliamentary elections that begin this weekend, Al-Nour is attempting a delicate balancing act.

It has to maintain its appeal to its ultraconservative base, which still wants to see greater implementation of Islamic Shariah law but is disillusioned with politics after Morsi's ouster or is disgusted with the party's actions. At the same time, it's trying to reach out to the political center, where anti-Islamist sentiment is high, with promises to unify and rebuild a polarized country.

"Progress, education, development, health care," was the message that echoed from the campaign rally packed with some 200 people, held in a tent set up the street of the Raml district in the Mediterranean coastal city of Alexandria Wednesday night.

The 2014 constitution bans religion-based political parties. Al-Nour insists it is not a religious party but rather one with a religious background that focuses on economic and social priorities like fighting endemic unemployment. Its campaign slogan is "Clarity and Ambition," and none of the 17 points in the program it distributed at the rally mentioned religion.

With memories of Morsi's ouster and the bloody crackdown on his supporters still fresh, Al-Nour is viewed as a traitor by the Brotherhood, which just a few years ago was the country's most organized political force.

Now the Brotherhood is banned from public life and declared a terrorist organization. And while Al-Nour may have alienated much of its base, it will be able to compete in parliamentary elections held in the coming weeks because of its support for President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi, the former general who led Morsi's overthrow.

"We're not talking about a democratic context where we can really judge popular sentiment based on how parties do in elections," said Shadi Hamid, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution's Center for Middle East Policy.

"I'm not necessarily talking about wide-scale fraud, but it's also in the lead-up to the election, how much media exposure they are allowed," he said. "How does the party get their message out to a larger audience? There aren't really clear avenues for that. So that's a kind of built-in limit to how well they can do and I think the regime will modulate that depending on what they're comfortable with in terms of Nour's share of the seats."

The government is heralding the elections, which take place in stages lasting through December, as the next step toward democracy, but critics and analysts say the legislature will be little more than a rubber stamp for el-Sissi. Independent monitors will be few, and turnout is expected to be much lower than for votes in recent years.

Founded after the 2011 uprising that toppled longtime autocrat Hosni Mubarak, Al-Nour won about a quarter of the vote in the country's first parliamentary election held later that year. It later broke with the Islamist group, however, accusing it of monopolizing power. Al-Nour's success in 2011 was in part due to its access to a flourishing free media that no longer exists.

Now, media heavyweights, commentators and petitioners have called for a ban on Al-Nour over its religious roots, accusing it of being a Brotherhood front.

Amr Mekky, an Al-Nour candidate for the 700,000 voters of Raml district in Alexandria — a city long considered a Salafi stronghold — says such critics are "misguided" and that there's been no official pressure on the party.

"We are above all being attacked by the Brotherhood, who are urging a boycott. Just look at social media," he said at the rally, referring to a slew of Facebook posts describing Al-Nour as stooges of el-Sissi and facilitators of his crackdown on political Islam.

"We want an end to the polarization, and are calling for Egyptians to build the country together, with all parties, youth, women and minorities represented in the next parliament for the security and stability of the country," he said.

Analysts say the party may be overextending itself and seeking to please too disparate an electorate.

The contradictions were on display at the rally. At one point, supporters chanted "Egypt is an Islamic country," although the party remains officially open to Christians and says it has some among its ranks. Later, prominent party supporters led a chant of "Long Live Egypt," el-Sissi's own campaign slogan when he won the presidency last year.

The party, which at one time sought to boost the role of Shariah — Islamic law — in Egypt, now says it is content with the country's current constitution, which it backed last year.

The multiple messages could prove perplexing to voters.

"The only people who are going to vote for them are people so committed to the Salafi (movement) and the specific individuals involved — and I don't think there are many of them," said Jonathan Brown, a scholar of Islam at Georgetown University. "The others who will vote for them are people who want to support the local pro-Sissi candidate, basically Sissi supporters who happen to have beards, and that's not the original constituency of the party."

For core supporters like 36-year-old Alaa Ghenim, meanwhile, the party's appeal remains clear: "Islamic Shariah law."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.