Pakistan bomb blast: why health workers keep getting attacked

The bomb blast that killed two and injured 20 near a health clinic was the latest effort targeting workers involved in anti-polio vaccination efforts. Will polio see a resurgence after years of declining numbers?

Mohammad Sajjad/AP
Pakistani police officers gather at the site of a bombing in Peshawar, Pakistan, Monday, Oct. 7, 2013. The bomb exploded next to a van carrying security officials who were supposed to protect workers giving out anti-polio vaccinations on Monday, said Pakistani officials.

A bomb exploded outside a health clinic in the troubled northwestern Pakistani city of Peshawar Monday, news reports said, killing two people in an attack that appeared to be the latest to target anti-polio vaccination efforts.

The bombing, which also injured 20, bodes ill for efforts to wipe out polio in Pakistan, which two years ago had the highest number of confirmed cases in the world, at 198.

Last year, thanks to aggressive vaccination and publicity campaigns, that number dropped to 58, hailed by many experts as an unmitigated success against the crippling disease that has all but been eradicated in the West. The World Health Organization had warned Pakistan that it could face travel and visa restrictions and sanctions imposed by other countries if polio continues to spread.

As of the beginning of October, Pakistan has reported 36 cases, according to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative, with eight new cases recorded last week alone, mainly in Federally Administered Tribal Areas, of which Peshawar is the administrative centre and economic hub.

News reports said the bomb hit a van outside the clinic. The van was carrying security workers accompanying health workers administering polio vaccines.

Along with Afghanistan and Nigeria, Pakistan is only one of three countries where polio remains endemic. Health experts blame deeply stubborn skepticism about the purposes of the vaccinations, fueled by radical Islamic propaganda, which has alleged the efforts are aimed at reducing Muslim populations.

That skepticism hardened further after the 2011 raid that killed Osama bin Laden in the Pakistani garrison town of Abbottabad. The CIA used a Pakistani doctor to confirm the presence of bin Laden under the guise of an immunization program.

Last year, a Taliban commander in northwest Pakistan announced a ban on polio vaccines for children in the region as long as the United States continues its campaign of drone strikes in the region.

A spokesman for one faction of the Pakistani Taliban claimed responsibility for Monday’s attacks.

More than 20 workers directly or indirectly tied to the anti-polio effort have been killed since 2011, according to various estimates.

Last month, Pakistan’s embattled prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, reaffirmed his government’s commitment to eradicate polio telling the UN General Assembly: “We have also made eradication of polio in Pakistan a matter of great importance for my government, as we are determined to make Pakistan a polio-free country."

Peshawar has already been at the epicenter of a wave of violence targeting government institutions throughout Pakistan.  A car bomb Sept. 29 killed 42 people in Peshawar’s ancient market, a week after an attack by a Taliban faction on the city’s Anglican church killed about 80 people, and two days after a bus bomb killed at least 17 city government employees. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Pakistan bomb blast: why health workers keep getting attacked
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today