Millennium Development Goal met: 2 billion access water

Some 89 percent of the global population is now using 'improved' water sources, that are protected from outside contamination. But the finding is controversial.

Khin Maung Win/AP/File
In this April 21 file photo, local residents carry plastic containers on their shoulders as they line up to fetch drinking water from a lake in Yangon, Myanmar.

More than 2 billion people have gained access to improved water sources since 1990. The Millennium Development Goal – to halve the number of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water – was met in 2010, five years ahead of schedule, according to a report compiled by the United Nations and the World Health Organization. This was measured by greater access to improved water sources – though the assessment is somewhat controversial because there is no guarantee of the quality or regular availability of the water. Still, many see it as progress in creating an infrastructure for clean, sustainable water access.

Some 89 percent of the global population is now using "improved" water sources, which are protected from outside contamination and include piped water into homes or yards, protected wells, and rainwater catchment. The progress is noteworthy given many countries' exploding populations, where growing needs can cancel out gains. Almost half the 2 billion people whose access to water sources improved since 1990 live in fast-growing China and India.

There are vital health and social implications to better water access. Every year, cholera affects millions of people, and 3,000 children die daily from diarrhea. Both can be linked to dirty water. Women in particular may benefit: They spend an estimated 200 million combined hours a day collecting water, according to water.org. Clean water access close to home increases school attendance for girls, reports UNICEF, and can free women to take on income-earning jobs.

"It's a great positive, but the caveat is that the progress hasn't been very even," says Tom Slaymaker, senior policy analyst at WaterAid. Some 780 million people are still without access to improved water sources, most of whom live in sub-Saharan Africa. "The next goal should be even more ambitious," Mr. Slaymaker says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.