Got something to tell the president? Try the White House's new Facebook bot

The White House's new Messenger bot will let citizens send notes to President Obama, possibly winding up among the 10 citizen letters he reads each night.

The White House/Pete Souza/Handout/Reuters/File
U.S. President Barack Obama signs a letter back to 76-year-old Cuban letter writer Ileana Yarza as he sits at his desk in the Oval Office of the White House in this official White House handout photo taken in Washington March 14, 2016 and released by the White House on March 17, 2016.

Have something you want to say to President Obama? Now, thanks to the White House's new Messenger bot, you can send it to him in a Facebook message. 

Since taking office, President Barack Obama has reportedly read 10 letters from citizens each night, responding to some with hand-written notes. With the help of a new Messenger chatbot, announced on Wednesday, a number of selected Facebook messages will also be added to the mix. 

Presidents going back as far as Thomas Jefferson have made an effort to communicate with the public, mostly through written letters. Today, the evolution of technology and social media has made it easier than ever for everyday citizens to keep in touch with the White House, whether by following the First Lady on Snapchat, mentioning Obama in tweets, or, now, sending a Facebook message. But with the ease and accessibility of social media also come challenges. 

"Our goal is to meet people where they are," Jason Goldman, the chief digital officer of the White House, writes in a press release, and "technology makes it possible for anyone with an internet connection to send a message to the President and his Administration." Messaging the president, he adds, will now be "as easy as messaging your closest friends." 

Many Americans have taken advantage of the opportunities that already exist: A Pew survey from 2014 found that 16 percent of registered voters followed candidates for office, political parties, or elected officials on social media, a 10 percentage increase from four years prior.

But, as anyone who has spent time on the internet knows, while the accessibility of such tools can be incredibly useful, they're also easily abused.

In 2011, the White House launched "We the People," an initiative that allowed citizens to start petitions online with the promise that any petition with 5,000 signatures (upped to 25,000 a month later and 100,000 in January of 2015) would receive an "official response" from the White House.

While many of the petitions address legitimate concerns, the site also, predictably, has attracted its fair share of prank proposals, ranging from a wish to change the national anthem to R&B singer R. Kelly's 2003 hit "Ignition (Remix)" to the construction of a real-life Death Star. 

"This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For," Paul Shawcross, the chief of the White House's Science and Space Branch, told disappointed Star Wars fans when the latter petition earned its "official response." The Obama administration is not a fan of "blowing up planets," he noted, and the project would cost upwards of 850 quadrillion dollars. 

Another challenge for the new chat set-up may be security, and maintaining a balance between collecting user information while retaining their privacy. 

Currently, the bot asks for users' zip code, full address, email, and phone number: information that some people may be reluctant to give, particularly as it's unclear who exactly – the White House? Facebook itself? The Democratic party? – has access to the information, notes Computerworld's John Brandon. 

So, what are the chances of your message making its way to the desk of the president? 

While it's impossible to say how many Facebookers will take advantage of the new Messenger feature, the White House receives about 65,000 print letters a week, along with 100,000 emails, 1,000 faxes, and 2,500 phone calls each day, The Christian Science Monitor's Dave Cook reported in 2009. 

In order to be one of the lucky 10 chosen out of thousands, a letter must be compelling, relevant to current events, and representative of the mail coming in, according to White House officials. 

"[N]ot only do these letters help me stay in touch with the people who sent me here, or the people who voted against me, but a lot of times they identify problems that might not have percolated up through the various agencies and bureaucracies," President Obama said in Wednesday's press release. "And more than once there have been occasions where these letters inspired action on real problems that are out there." 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.