How Sanders remaining in race is costing taxpayers

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) of Vermont has remained in the presidential race and is still receiving Secret Service protection, costing US taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars a day. 

Mary Altaffer/AP/File
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) of Vermont, pictured here in April 2016 surrounded by Secret Service agents in New York, has remained in the race for president despite being mathematically eliminated.

What about Bernie?

Sanders was mathematically eliminated from the Democratic presidential race earlier this month, but the Vermont senator isn't ready to bow out and that means highly trained Secret Service agents shadow his every move at a cost to taxpayers of tens of thousands of dollars a day.

Sanders, who touts his frugality and espouses cost-saving national policies, has laid off much of his staff and is no longer holding campaign events or rallies. Yet every day a detail of Secret Service agents protects a man who won't be president. As many as 50 agents are involved in protecting each candidate on a daily basis.

The Secret Service won't say what the agency is spending to protect Sanders. But former Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan testified in April 2008 that the agency was spending about $37,000 to $38,000 a day to protect presidential candidates, including then-Sen. Barack Obama. Sullivan told a budget panel at the time that the agency expected that cost to be about $44,000 a day as the campaign "tempo" picked up.

Though a specific cost is hard to pin down, it's fair to say that Sanders' protective detail costs U.S. taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars a day.

Since 1968, major presidential candidates have been afforded a protective detail starting about 120 days before the election. But candidates can and have asked for protection well in advance of the nominating conventions.

Sanders' request for protection was approved by Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson earlier this year and suit-clad agents started surrounding him in February. At the time, he met the requirements for a protective detail in advance of his party's convention in part because he was a candidate in a major party who had "some degree of prominence as shown by opinion polls" and was campaigning for primaries in at least 10 states.

But primary season is over and Sanders doesn't have enough delegates to overtake Hillary Clinton for the nomination.

So when will the Secret Service stand down? That's unclear.

Sanders can call for the security force to leave his side any time he wants or formally drop out of the race. But short of that or a directive from Johnson, the armed security detail likely will surround him until Clinton is formally nominated, said Secret Service spokeswoman Catherine Milhoan.

Sanders has said very little about his future plans, other than he will work to keep Trump out of the White House.

Sanders' Senate colleagues said it was up to him to decide when and how to get out of the race.

"You know, that's his decision," said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn.

Sen. Edward Markey, D-Mass., said said there was no need for Sanders to drop out of the race now.

"I think that Bernie still has an opportunity to play an extremely constructive role at the (Democratic) convention to ensure that Donald Trump never becomes president," Markey said. "I think it's still within the realm of possibilities that that's exactly how it's all going to play out."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.