Why doesn't pay for early childhood educators stack up?

A new Department of Education report sheds light on the 'troubling pay gap' facing preschool teachers in comparison with their colleagues who teach older students.

Steve Pope/AP/File
Angie Clark, a preschool teacher, reads to a group of four and five year old students at Mitchell Elementary School in Des Moines, Iowa in 2011.

Early childhood educators earn significantly less than teachers of older children, and often make so little that they qualify for public benefits, according to a new report by the United States Department of Education.

The gap between teachers in early child care, preschool, and Head Start positions and their counterparts in kindergarten and above is wide, especially considering the impact that early education has been shown to have on children's educational and eventual career success. The Education Department study compared early educators’ wages to those of tree trimmers, parking lot attendants, and janitors, a disparity noted by department secretary John B. King, Jr.

Undervaluing nation’s early childhood educators flies in the face of what we know about brain development and the optimal time for learning. Educating children before kindergarten requires significant knowledge, expertise, and skill – especially in light of the critical importance of the early years for children's growth, development, and future academic and life success,” Mr. King said in a release on the study.

“This report is a call to action for all of us,” he added.

According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, preschool teachers (excluding those in special education) earned a median annual wage of $28,570, about 55 percent less than the annual median wage of $51,640 for kindergarten teachers. Elementary and middle school teachers’ median wages are slightly higher, at $54,890 and $55,860 per year, respectively. The report also noted that 97 percent of early childhood educators are women.

The low pay contrasts with the importance of such positions in providing a foundation for students’ education, as well as with the pay of similarly qualified jobs in other fields. The Department noted that “early learning caregivers and teachers with a Bachelor's degree earn nearly half the average earnings of individuals with a Bachelor's degree overall,” despite the qualification equivalence. And even though most education institutions have upped their requirements for employees’ training and education level, wages have not risen.

“Wage parity across settings is critical to attracting and retaining a high-quality workforce, essential for a high-quality program,” said Linda Smith, the Administration for Children & Families’ deputy assistant secretary for early childhood development, in the release.

The large pay gap could partially be explained by a societal view of early childhood teachers as less skilled or essential than educators in the official K-12 cycle, more like a caregiver or nanny than a teacher. But previous child development research has shown that “the work of all lead educators for young children of all ages requires the same high level of sophisticated knowledge and competencies,” a fact not backed by early educators’ lowered public perception. That difference “compromises the quality of learning experiences for young children,” according to the Education Department.

“A teacher's salary level reflects how the work is valued by society. To maximize the potential of our young children and the educators and programs that serve them, we must do more to support and lift up preschool teachers,” said Libby Doggett, deputy assistant secretary for Policy and Early Learning. Dr. Doggett said her experience showed educators with incentives to become more qualified ended up improving their teaching and “classroom management.”

“As a nation, we must do better to honor early childhood educators as professionals,” said Doggett.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.