What do the Oregon occupiers want with government documents?

The armed group occupying a national wildlife refuge in Oregon claims it has found government documents there that will help exonerate convicted arsonists Steven and Dwight Hammond and expose government injustice against local ranchers.

Rick Bowmer/AP
Ammon Bundy, center, speaks with a reporter at a news conference at Malheur National Wildlife Refuge on Friday near Burns, Ore. Bundy, the leader of an armed group occupying the national wildlife refuge to protest federal land management policies, said Friday he and his followers are not ready to leave even though the sheriff and many locals say the group has overstayed their welcome.

Ammon Bundy, the leader of the armed group occupying an Oregon wildlife refuge, said Monday that he and his fellow occupiers are searching through government documents stored in the facility.

Mr. Bundy’s party took control of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters earlier this year after local ranchers Steven and Dwight Hammond, who were convicted of arson in 2012, were returned to prison after prosecutors argued that the Hammonds’ original sentences did not meet federal minimums. Bundy says the Malheur occupation will not end until the Hammonds are freed and government prejudice against ranchers is exposed.

The Hammonds’ lawyer said Bundy and his “militia” do not represent the views of the family.

While Bundy says his group is not accessing government computers or personnel records at the site, he claimed documents found in storage could demonstrate discrimination against local ranchers as well as provide information that could free the Hammonds.

This new strategy by the occupiers comes after several other militia groups gathered near the refuge last week to meet with Bundy. While they agreed with Bundy’s points, they did not support his occupation but remained nearby, in hotels or in their vehicles, according to Reuters.

After Bundy spoke Monday, members of his group drove through the refuge to the border of a nearby ranch and tore down a fence set up by the government. The group acted to allow a rancher access to what they said was public land, in a move condemned by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, which manages the refuge.

"Removing fences, damaging any Refuge property, or unauthorized use of equipment would be additional unlawful actions by the illegal occupiers," the service said in a statement, according to The Associated Press. "Any movement of cattle onto the Refuge or other activities that are not specifically authorized by USFWS constitutes trespassing."

A crew used a Fish and Wildlife excavator to destroy the fence, and Bundy said the removal is “The first step of many in restoring ranchers’ rights.”

The occupation has caused the closure of nearby schools and government offices, and regular employees of the refuge are either working from outside locations or remain on leave. Schools in Burns, Ore., reopened after one week, while government offices including those of the Bureau of Land Management remain closed.

The removal of the fence, along with the retrieval of federal documents, are the first major moves made by Bundy’s group since the initial takeover of the property on January 2. Despite Bundy’s claims of a “peaceful” protest, his team is armed and have been labelled by some as domestic terrorists and condemned by the community, law enforcement, and the federal service.

“This refuge belongs to the American public,” said Fish and Wildlife spokesman Jason Holm to The New York Times. “The steps they’re taking – the occupation they’re doing – actually robs the American public of experiencing one of the premier wildlife and birding refuges in the United States. It upsets us. But it should upset all Americans.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.