More US boots on the ground: Obama authorizes special ops to fight ISIS

In a 'unilateral' action, the Obama Administration is sending Special Operations troops into Iraq to combat Islamic State militants.

Michael Wyke/Tulsa World via AP
Zack Wheeler, brother of Joshua Wheeler, gets condolences from Sequoyah Co. deputy Thomas Stafford outside the Trinity United Methodist Church in Muldrow, Okla., where a service was held for Joshua by family and friends, Tuesday, Nov. 24, 2015. Joshua Wheeler was killed in Iraq during a raid against ISIS targets. Held was buried at Arlington National Cemetary in Washington D.C.

President Obama’s policy on sending troops into Syria has always been a defiant “no.”

Until last month, that is, when Obama ordered several dozen Special Operations troops into Syria to help train Kurdish fighters against the Islamic State. 

In the wake of the Paris attacks, Hillary Clinton delivered a speech in New York last week where she spoke for an hour but her message was short: “The time for delay is over. We should get this done.” Clinton urged Congress to take stronger military action against the Islamic State. 

Obama famously called the Paris attacks an “act against humanity” and offered France air support and military intelligence. But speaking at the G20 Summit, Obama refused to send more troops into Syria, saying that boots on the ground “would be a mistake.”

Until now. 

In a statement on Tuesday, Defense Secretary Ash Carter announced that the United States would be deploying a second round of Special Operations troops to Iraq to conduct raids, free hostages, and capture Islamic State leaders. The size of the force remains unannounced, but according to Carter it will be larger than the group in Syria. The US team will be working with the Iraqi government and security forces, as well as Kurdish peshmerga forces says the Pentagon chief.

The Iraqi operation will be conducted unilaterally with the Syria operation and seems to be part of a larger, more aggressive strategy from the US to take down the Islamic State. 

In the weeks following the Paris attacks that killed 130 people in France on November 13th, many Western leaders have been under extreme pressure to accelerate what has become a US-led coalition effort in Syria. Obama has come under heavy criticism, especially from Congressional Republicans, who say he is moving too slowly.

Republican Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham called last week to triple the effort, that is, to send 20,000 troops into Syria immediately.

"The question ... is being asked all over the capitals of the West right now," Mr. McCain told Reuters. "(Arab) countries for a long time have not seen what's happening as a direct threat to them. Now I believe that they do.”

Sending a new team into Iraq is a major step towards the acceleration process. The move, according to top US military officer Marine Corps General Joseph Dunford, “will make our operations much more effective.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.