On US college campuses, a debate over what is considered 'free speech'

On US college and university campuses, are views changing on academic freedom of expression?

Mark Schierbecker via AP
In this Nov. 9, 2015 frame from video provided by Mark Schierbecker, Melissa Click, right, an assistant professor in Missouri's communications department, confronts Schierbecker and later calls for "muscle" to help remove him from the protest area in Columbia, Mo. Protesters credited with helping oust the University of Missouri System's president and the head of its flagship campus welcomed reporters to cover their demonstrations Tuesday, a day after a videotaped clash between some protesters and a student photographer drew media condemnation as an affront to the free press.

Students in America are angry.

Over what, exactly? The debate is deeply philosophical at the core. In one camp stand minority students who say they feel marginalized want to protect their safety. In the other camp are those who say they wish to uphold academia's longstanding tradition of fostering debate, and welcoming dissent, on sensitive issues.

The two forces collided in what is now a famous example from the University of Missouri, where ESPN photographer Tim Tai was blocked by a mob from documenting Missouri students protesting in a public space. The mob chanted “Go, go, go!” while Tai fired back, “The First Amendment protects your right and mine to be here.”

The Twitter account associated with the activists later explained, “We ask for no media in the parameters so the place where people live, fellowship, and sleep can be protected from twisted insincere narratives. It’s typically white media who don’t understand the importance of respecting black spaces.” 

The Missouri case – which resulted in the resignation of the university's president – illustrates a deeper thread snaking across college campuses: a shift in thought about freedom of expression in academia. At Yale University, protests over a faculty’s email about Halloween costumes erupted into controversy that simmered for days. A top administrator at Claremont McKenna College resigned last week amid race protsts. The University of Southern California is devoting an entire fund to creating “diversity” talks. At Mount Holyoke, students cancelled a production of the play "The Vagina Monologues" because it failed to include transgender women. 

In short, college administrators have a lot to deal with right now. Some commentators have complained that what’s missing is adult leadership.

“Too often university presidents, their boards of trustees and leading political figures default, and quickly, to the most reactionary progressives in modern student bodies,” wrote The Wall Street Journal. “We want to be clear about this, because so many of these university leaders regard themselves as principled liberals. But their timidity is putting at risk the classical liberal values that are the essence of the idea of a university.”

The deeper question university administrators are faced with is how to reconcile an issue as intangible as creating “safe spaces” for its student body – a safe space that, as was the case with Missouri, is exclusive of discussion, and even media coverage.

On Tuesday The New York Times published a report of collected grievances from students around the country. 

The list is long – and varied. Grievances vary from witnessing a student fly a Confederate flag on campus to a Latina woman being told to “go back to Iran.”

This isn’t the first time American academia has wrestled with so-called political correctness. In the 1980’s and ‘90’s, student protests were surging. But as reported by The Atlantic, today's protests have a different basis. “That movement [in the '80s and '90s] sought to restrict speech (specifically hate speech aimed at marginalized groups), but it also challenged the literary, philosophical and historical canon, seeking to widen it by including more-diverse perspectives. The current movement is about emotional well-being.”

The movement to restrict hate speech from campuses in the 80’s was largely successful; campuses saw a paradigm shift in the vocabulary concerning minority students. But today's movement is harder to define, at least in part because many see it as a paradoxical movement that does something not usually associated with campus protests, and that is to limit freedom of expression.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to On US college campuses, a debate over what is considered 'free speech'
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today