James Lawler Duggan/Reuters
Attendees are led in prayer at a rally convened by Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan and billed as 'Justice or Else' to mark the 20th anniversary of the Million Man March on the National Mall in Washington October 10. The original Million Man March took place on October 16, 1995.

Million Man March: What's different 20 years later?

Decades after the original gathering of black men, thousands assemble for a peaceful rally on the National Mall to demand justice from the US government.

On Saturday, thousands of black men, women, and children converged on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., to demand justice from the US government. 

The gathering commemorated the 20th anniversary of the Million Man March, a large, peaceful rally of black men inspired by leaders in the black community to take responsibility for their lives, families, and communities.

Echoing the rallying cry of the 1995 event, speakers at this weekend’s “Justice or Else” gathering called for justice at a time of heightened public attention on the killings of black men by police and on rising poverty in minority communities. As last time, the rally was organized by Louis Farrakhan, leader of the National of Islam and a controversial religious figure known for his antisemitic and antigay remarks.

But unlike the march 20 years ago, Saturday’s event welcomed women and other marginalized groups, including native Americans and Latinos, and called not just for introspection, but also for economic boycotts.

“We have a purchasing power of over 1 trillion dollars, but in our reckless and wasteful spending habits we have not been able to pool our resources in a collective manner to build institutions and create jobs for our people,” event organizers wrote online.

“Let us start us start by not spending money we either don’t have or cannot afford during the Christmas season,” they instructed.

Speakers at the peaceful rally in the nation’s capital, which drew fewer than the hundreds of thousands of people who turned out for the 1995 march, according to The Washington Post, pointed both to progress and to stagnation in the state of justice for blacks in America.

“Twenty years ago, the death of Tamir Rice would have fallen on deaf ears and been left for the police to write a false report, not broadcast for the world to know,” rally organizer Tamika Mallory told the crowd, reported the Post, having read a list of young black men who have been killed by police in recent years, including Tamir Rice of Cleveland, Michael Brown of Ferguson, Mo., and Eric Garner of Staten Island.

“Michael Brown’s body would have only traumatized the community, rather than wake up the people,” Ms. Mallory said.

Though the nation performed the once-unimaginable by twice electing a black president – who attended the 1995 march as a an Illinois state senate candidate – the unemployment rate among blacks remains double the rate among whites. And police killings of unarmed black men continue, having prompted outrage and a new, racially diverse movement called Black Lives Matter.

Though President Obama was in California during this year’s rally, and there were fewer national black leaders like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, according to the Post, there were more young adults and more women, perhaps pointing to a new wave of leaders joining the civil rights movement. Passion has been sparked among younger generations in recent years because of increasing poverty, consistent unemployment, and police violence in minority communities.  

“It is because of continued injustice that people are crying out for justice,” Benjamin F. Chavis Jr., the former NAACP chief who directed the Million Man March and was a consultant for Saturday’s rally, told the Post. “It would be incorrect to say we have made no progress. But it would be equally incorrect to say all is well.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Million Man March: What's different 20 years later?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today