Four-day week for Georgia public school district: Does it work?

Students will have each Monday off from school, saving the county $800,000.

Rogelio V. Solis/AP
In this May 13, 2015, file photo, a group of Cleveland, Miss., public school students ride the bus on their way home following classes. According to a new report on child welfare, twelve percent of teens from Mississippi and Louisiana were neither in school nor working.

As kids head back to school in August, students in Chattooga, Georgia will only strap on their backpacks four days a week. This is the second consecutive year that the school district is operating with this atypical schedule, and metrics indicate the switch has had a positive effect on the students.

“It has increased our discipline, our attendance is good, teacher attendance as well," said Jeff Martin, Chattooga High School principal to WSB-TV News in Atlanta. "We keep, and we have a data room where we keep up with all that. We improved in six of the eight end-of-course tests as of last year.” Students and parents see this new schedule as “less stressful” while Mr. Martin also cites reduced operating costs as a reason to continue with this newer model.

In the state of Georgia, schools are required to have no less than a daily average of five and a half hours of daily “instructional time” based on a 180-school-day calendar, according to guidelines set forth by the Georgia Department of Education. Martin says that Chattooga High School is able to meet state requirements for the minimum hours by having longer, but fewer days; teens at Chattooga High School start their day at 7:40 am and the final bell for the day sounds at 3:45 pm. 

School officials who spoke with US News and World Report for a 2013 story about the four-day school week were largely unsure of the benefits of the switch, aside from decreased operating costs. These savings were largely from diminished hours of non-salaried employees, such as bus drivers, secretaries, and cafeteria staff. 

In 2013, schools in Garfield, Colo. had just finished their first year of a four-day week schedule, and were unwilling to declare a total victory, despite saving a reported $480,000. The schools were attempting to work with community partners, such as the public library, in order to ensure students were kept busy on the fifth day, but had met uneven success. And in Idaho’s Hansen School District, which began using the four-day week in 2010, teachers still come in for the fifth day for professional development.

In the early 2000s, a number of rural schools across the country began to cut back to four-day weeks for students, largely for budget reasons, a move that Ted Sizer, the former dean of Harvard’s School of Education, described as a disgrace to the educational ideals of the ‘richest country in the history of the world.’

‘My instinct is that it's a trend in the wrong direction," said Mr. Sizer to The Christian Science Monitor. "Kids need a lot of attention in schools and to reduce the days they have per week in an already shortened academic year, it doesn't make an awful lot of sense."

While some families have been able to adapt to the new schedule, many families with two working parents with inflexible work schedules haven't been able to come up with a perfect solution to having kids in the home alone. 

The school districts involved in the program thus far all have expressed desires for other community centers to step forward and help provide activities to occupy the kids on the fifth day. While some monetary benefits have arisen from this change, the amounts the schools have saved have dramatically ranged from tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

While the long-term success of Chattooga remains to be seen, as of July 2015 Hansen and Garfield schools still use a four-day school week, as noted on the schools' respective websites.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.