Anti-domestic violence activists say Ray Rice should get a second chance

The co-founders of A Call To Men, a national anti-domestic violence organization, are advocating that the former Ravens running back be given a second chance in the NFL. 

Jason DeCrow/AP/File
Ray Rice arrives with his wife Janay Palmer for an appeal hearing of his indefinite suspension from the NFL in New York on Nov. 5, 2014.

Advocacy for Ray Rice’s return to the NFL has come from an unexpected source: the leaders of an anti-domestic violence group.  

Tony Porter and Ted Bunch, co-founders of the national organization A Call To Men, say the former Baltimore Ravens running back deserves a second chance in the NFL. 

"A lot of people think we should kick him to the curb and his name should be mud forever. But how great would it be if everyone who made a mistake made it their mission to make sure a million people don't make the same mistake?" Mr. Porter said in an ESPN interview. "To use the influence that he has, what a great way to correct that wrong.”

After video footage of Mr. Rice punching his then-fiancée (and now-wife) Janay Palmer unconscious in a hotel elevator surfaced in September 2014, Rice was dropped by the Ravens and indefinitely banned from playing professionally. 

He was reinstated in the NFL in November, but has yet to be picked up by another team. So far, several teams have privately discussed bringing Rice on, but none have actually acted, ESPN reports.

Porter and Mr. Bunch, who have worked with Rice since November, say that they hope that will change. 

Finding a team to take him may be a challenge, however. As The Guardian reports, a online poll by ESPN SportsNation at the time of Rice’s reinstatement showed that 58 percent of the more than 400,000 people who opted to vote in the poll would not want their team to sign him.

But Porter and Bunch say the running back is “transparent” and “sincere” and genuinely regrets his actions. 

“He has a desire to compete again, but also to make a difference in the world,” Bunch said. “This is what mistakes should be about: learning from them and teaching others.”

Others are already learning from the incident, as the infamous video of Rice and  Ms. Palmer sparked a nationwide debate about the larger problem of domestic violence in professional football. 

“The NFL has a violence against women problem and it is so far beyond the single Ray Rice incident that, I just can’t say, ‘This is how women should feel about Ray Rice being back on the field,’” said Terry O’Neill, the president of the National Organization for Women, to The Guardian.

To combat this problem, the NFL launched a “No More” campaign that included the first-ever domestic violence ad during the Super Bowl. In December, the league announced a new policy that outlined clearer punishments, established funds for counseling, expanded services for victims and violators, and set up a new special counsel. 

But some say the solution to the problem lies not in stricter punishments for Rice or other players accused of domestic abuse, but in changing the hypermasculine culture surrounding the NFL. 

"I think the conversation that the NFL is having on the punitive side,” former Syracuse quarterback and longtime gender equity activist Don McPherson told espnW. "It doesn't address the core issue of men's violence against women, which is the culture of masculinity and men that leads to misogyny and sexism and the overall notion that women are less than, which is very much a message that comes out of a lot of language in sport. And until we address those core issues, the problem will continue.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.