George W. Bush charges vets group $100,000 for speech. Too much?

In the past 40 years, former US presidents have been able to charge higher fees for various speaking engagements. But former President George W. Bush may have struck a nerve by charging a steep price for a 2012 speech to a wounded veterans group.

Molly Riley/AP
Former President George W. Bush speaks at the US Chamber of Commerce Foundation's Hiring Our Heroes program and the George W. Bush Institute's Military Service Initiative national summit, June 24, at the US Chamber of Commerce in Washington.

Sky-high speaking fees have become an accepted, if begrudged, staple of the modern post-presidency. Bill Clinton commands upwards of $200,000 for some speeches, and reportedly pulled in a $500,000 donation to his foundation for one. Former actor Ronald Reagan turned his talent into a lucrative third career. Even Gerald Ford defended his right to charge hefty sums for hitting the "mashed potato circuit."

But what if a former president charges $100,000 to speak to a group of veterans wounded in wars he started while in office?

That's exactly what former President George W. Bush did in 2012 – and now, he's coming under fire for it.

Bush charged the Texas-based charity Helping a Hero $100,000 for a 2012 speech at a charity fundraiser for veterans who lost limbs in the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars, ABC News first reported. The former president was also flown in a private jet, at a cost of $20,000 to the charity, which provides specially-adapted homes for handicapped veterans.

Board members told ABC it was a "slap in the face" for wounded veterans.

"For him to be paid to raise money for veterans that were wounded in combat under his orders, I don't think that's right," former Marine Eddie Wright, who lost both his hands in a 2004 rocket attack in Fallujah, Iraq, told ABC.

But the board's chairman told NBC News Bush's appearance helped to raise "significant funds" for the charity. The year that Bush spoke, the charity netted almost $2.5 million; the next year, less than half that amount.

The controversy over Bush's $100,000 speaking fee is the latest in a series of questions over ex-presidents' exorbitant paydays, how they got so high, and whether they are appropriate.

Last month, Politico reported that Bush – who reportedly told author Robert Draper he planned to "replenish the ol' coffers" on the lecture circuit after leaving the White House – makes between $100,000 and $175,000 for every speech he gives. He has given at least 200 speeches since leaving office in 2009, which translates into more than $30 million for the former president in speech fees alone.

Of course, he's not the only one.

Since leaving the White House in 2001, Clinton made a cool $106 million on the lecture circuit, according to a 2013 CNN report.

Reagan faced outrage – and some admiration – for charging $2 million for two, 20-minute speeches in Japan in 1989.

The practice goes back to Gerald Ford, reports Politico, who slowly commanded more and more for his speeches: $10,000, then $20,000, then $40,000, paving the way for his modern counterparts to charge as much as half a million per speech.

“I’m a private citizen now; it’s nobody’s business,” Ford told The New York Times.

How did ex-presidents' fees skyrocket from $10,000 to $100,000 or more?

The Washington Speakers Bureau, founded in 1979, played a major role, writes Fortune.

"The desire among agencies to maximize fees, and the added ability to negotiate that comes with having professional representation, means organizations are more likely to see speaking fees grow," it writes. "Plus, the agency system simply provides more access to influential figures like ex-presidents, meaning more groups are able to get the power elites they want, if they are willing to pay the price."

Organizations like Helping a Hero are willing to pay high fees not to hear Bush's witticisms, but simply to add prestige and publicity to their event and their organization by virtue of snagging a big name speaker.

But while Bush and Clinton have made headlines recently for their sky-high rates, one of the most expensive speeches ever made was by a current presidential hopeful: Donald Trump.

The billionaire businessman-turned celebrepreneur-turned White House hopeful, who displayed his unusual speaking talents at his own presidential launch ceremony June 16, snagged $1.5 million for a speech at a Learning Annex real estate wealth expo in 2006.

At the time, the organization's president and founder, Bill Zanker told reporters, "He is worth every penny."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to