On social issues, Americans are more liberal than ever before. What's behind the sudden shift?

A Gallup survey of Americans reveals a sharp turn to the left on social issues. What is driving it?

Andrew Harnik/AP
An American flag and a rainbow colored flag flies in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, Monday, April 27, 2015, as the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments on the constitutionality of state bans on same-sex marriage on Tuesday.

From acceptance of same-sex relationships and premarital sex to having a baby outside of marriage, Americans are more socially liberal than ever before.

That's according to a new Gallup survey that finds Americans are becoming more liberal on several social issues – and more liberal in general.

Some 63 percent of Americans now say gay or lesbian relations are "morally acceptable." That's a 23-point jump since 2001, when only 40 percent felt that way, according to Gallup. That jump reflects the greatest shift in opinion to the left of any issue Gallup measured in its survey. 

Americans today are also more accepting of having a child out of wedlock: 61 percent said it's OK, compared with 45 percent in 2001. And some 68 percent of Americans now say sex outside of marriage is acceptable, compared with 53 percent in 2001.

In fact, increasingly liberal attitudes on social issues reflects a wider leftward shift as Americans become more liberal in general. For the first time in Gallup's records on this subject, an equal number of Americans now identify as socially liberal and socially conservative. Thirty-one percent of Americans describe their views as liberal, matching the number who describe their views as conservative, according to Gallup.

What's driving this national shift to the left? Is it because people have changed their minds, or is it because people died and were replaced by younger people with different beliefs?

"I would think that a lot of it has to do with the aging of our population," says Lou Manza, professor and department chair of psychology at Lebanon Valley College. "People growing up in the 1940s and 1950s ... were raised in a broad culture that was way more conservative than people coming of age in the 1960s and beyond. And with each passing generation, our culture, collectively, has become more and more accepting of ideas that, many years ago, had negative connotations."

In fact, according to Gallup, population replacement was a major factor in explaining changes in overall ideology.

"These longer-term trends ... may be a result of population changes, with younger, more liberal Americans entering adulthood while older, more conservative adults pass on," Gallup said in its report.

But the shift in attitudes is so dramatic that demographics alone cannot be responsible, says Jeff Bosworth, associate professor of political science at Mansfield University.

Professor Bosworth speculates that a certain social snowball effect is at work, as increasing acceptance breeds increasing acceptance.

"As more Americans have LGBT friends, relatives, and others, they become far more accepting of different lifestyles," he says. "And as more states legalize gay marriage, the purported threat of gay marriage simply dissipates. In other words, familiarity breeds acceptance."

The rise in popularity of libertarianism – a political philosophy that emphasizes autonomy and freedom of choice – may also play a role.

"I think a related factor is that the legalization of gay marriage has been largely cast as a civil rights issue," says Bosworth. "Most everyone understands the desire to be free and make personal choices to live their lives."

And while Americans largely remain conservative on economic issues, the leftward shift on social issues will have significant implications in marriage and in politics.

As Gallup said in an apparent message to Republicans running for office, "It may be more important now than in the past for the GOP nominee to be a bit less conservative on social issues in order to appeal to the broader general electorate."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.