To get their diploma, Arizona students must pass citizenship test

Proponents of the new law claim that Americans do not know enough about civics, but some believe that using US citizenship tests isn’t the best way to promote civic awareness.

Ross D. Franklin/AP
Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey (l.) smiles as he shakes hands with son Jack Ducey, second from left, as sons Joe Ducey and Sam Ducey (r.) look on during inauguration ceremonies at the Arizona Capitol in Phoenix, Jan. 5. The Arizona Legislature passed a bill Thursday requiring high school students to correctly answer 60 of 100 questions on the civics portion of the test required to become a US citizen in order to graduate.

On Thursday, Arizona became the first state in the nation to make passing a US citizenship test on civics a requirement for high school graduation. The bill, which newly elected Gov. Doug Ducey (R) signed into law Thursday evening, was passed among a nationwide effort to boost civic education.

Proponents of the new law claim that Americans do not know enough about civics and that urgent measures must be taken to ensure American students at the very least develop the same baseline knowledge required for new citizens.

“Every new citizen has to demonstrate this knowledge, so this is creating a community standard of what we want everyone to know,” Sam Stone, a spokesman for the Civics Education Initiative, the nonprofit pushing the test nationwide, told the Monitor in December. “This is a basic test.” But some believe that using US citizenship tests isn’t the best way to promote civic awareness, and that students will not become engaged with the issues by studying for yet another test.

A 2011 survey by The University of Pennsylvania's Annenberg Public Policy Center found that just 15 percent of Americans could correctly identify the chief justice of the US Supreme Court as John Roberts. Meanwhile, only 13 percent knew the US Constitution was signed in 1787 and only 38 percent were able to name all three branches of government, The Washington Post reported.

Meanwhile, Arizona House majority leader Steve Montenegro (R) recently cited a federal study that found two-thirds of students measured below proficiency in civics.

However, not everyone is convinced that testing is the answer.

"The interest is promoting civics, and we want to see students engaged,” Joe Thomas, a high school government teacher from Mesa, Ariz.told the Associated Press. "I don't know if a test engages students."

Many education advocates argue that students are already tested too much and question whether they really absorb and retain the information they are required to memorize to pass a test.

David Bradley, the only Democrat on the Arizona Senate Education Committee who voted against the bill, says that civic engagement cannot be measured by just one test.

"Don't be fooled into thinking that this does it, that this solves some bigger problem, because it doesn't," Bradley said on the Senate floor, AP reported. "My point now is tests don't make citizens, citizens are tested by their actions."

But the ability of tests to promote learning may be underestimated. In 2011, research published in the scientific journal Science found that students who read a passage and then took a test asking them to recall what they had read, retained around 50 percent more of the information a week later than students who used other methods.

Arizona students will now be permitted to take the test as many times as they need to pass. But many educators still fear that taking the same test multiple times won’t lead to learning.

"The kids who retake are the ones who need more instruction, but the more they retake, the less instructional time they get," Debbie Brockett, a high school principal in Las Vegas, told  NPR when questioned about end of year testing in American schools.

Meanwhile, Steve Yarbrough, the Republican Arizona Senate majority leader who sponsored the bill in his chamber, conceded that "requiring that students pass this test is not by any means a silver bullet,” although he does believe it is a step forward, AP reported.

The new law will require students to answer 60 out of 100 questions correctly in order to graduate. This is the same requirement for new citizen applicants. In total, 18 states are likely to consider civics test requirements this year, according to the Joe Foss Institute, the Arizona-based nonprofit organization that authored the bill.

Think you could pass the test? Take the Monitor’s US citizenship test to find out.

This report includes material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.