California railroad accident: Two couples hit while taking pictures of sunset

Reports suggest that two couples walked onto a railroad trestle near a Santa Barbara, Calif., beach to watch the sunset. Pedestrian train accidents are rising.

Jeff Roberson/AP/File
An Amtrak train passes a crossing amid Illinois cornfields in this file photo. Railroad safety, particularly for pedestrians, is a mounting concern.

One woman was killed and two others were injured when two couples walked onto a railroad trestle to take pictures of the sunset Saturday evening in southern California, according to local reports. A train came around the corner and three of the four people could not run fast enough to escape, writes KSBY News.

The case comes as some evidence points to a rise in pedestrian train accidents nationwide. A 2013 investigation by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch found that fatal pedestrian train accidents had increased 25 percent in the first eight months of the year compared with the same period in 2012.

Saturday’s tragedy, which happened about 20 west of Santa Barbara, Calif., points to the difficulty of making railroad tracks safer. Fencing off railroad tracks is often impractical, especially in areas that are not naturally high-traffic pedestrian zones. The trestle where the accident took place Saturday was located in a rural area just north of Refugio State Beach.

The primary causes of train accidents involving pedestrians and motorists involve poor judgment, according to Operation Lifesaver, a rail safety education group. They include:

  • Grossly misjudging the speed of an oncoming train.
  • Trying to beat a train across the tracks.
  • Becoming distracted by talking on a cellphone, texting, or listening to loud music.
  • A pedestrian or motorist being intoxicated.
  • Someone becoming “too familiar” with a crossing and not heeding warning signs.
  • Walking or driving onto tracks immediately after one train has passed without looking for a train coming from the other direction.

The train involved in Saturday’s accident was traveling at the correct speed, according to the KSBY report. One woman died at the scene and the second sustained moderate injuries. One man sustained major injuries and was airlifted to a hospital and the second was not hit by the train.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.