Sunil Tripathi body found; Brown student was misidentified in Boston bombing

Based on photos from the Boston Marathon bombing, social media postings suggested Brown student Sunil Tripathi might be the suspect. Reddit apologized for the 'dangerous speculation.'

Courtesy of Brown University/Reuters
This undated photo shows Brown University student Sunil Tripathi. The Rhode Island medical examiner's office on Thursday identified a body pulled from waters off a Providence park as that of Tripathi, missing since mid-March.

Among the mistakes in early reporting of the Boston Marathon bombing was the implication that Brown University student Sunil Tripathi, an Indian American, was somehow involved.

After the FBI released pictures and video of the bombing suspects, posters to online sites Reddit and Twitter speculated that Mr. Tripathi looked like one of the suspects.

The 22-year old philosophy major had been missing since March 15.

On Thursday a body found two days earlier in the water at a Providence, R.I., park by the university crew team was identified as that of Tripathi.

Identified by dental records, the body was described by Providence Police Cmdr. Thomas Oates as having been in the water for "some time."

But before that, the burden on Tripathi’s family – and on many Indian Americans – was frightening.

He had left behind his cell phone and a note that apparently didn’t say much, writes Amy Davidson in the New Yorker. “But [it] was enough to remind his family of what they already knew: that he had suffered from depression, that they wanted him to come home, that they would do nothing but embrace him if he did.”

For hours – until brothers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were identified as the prime suspects in the Boston bombing – the Tripathi family agonized about what they knew to be wildly erroneous information posted about Sunil.

“What followed … was horrifying for those of us living away from our country of origin,” writes Shivangi Misra in Mint, an Indian business newspaper published collaboratively with the Wall Street Journal. “With each passing tweet, the chorus to establish Tripathi’s guilt grew. And with it, grew the fear of retribution that the Indian community in the US would likely face in the coming days.”

On Monday, Reddit general manager Erik Martin apologized for the "dangerous speculation" that "spiraled into very negative consequences for innocent parties."

In a blog post, reported by USA Today, Mr. Martin specifically apologized to the Tripathi family "for the pain they have had to endure."

"The Reddit staff and the millions of people on Reddit around the world deeply regret that this happened," he said. "We all need to look at what happened and make sure that in the future we do everything we can to help and not hinder crisis situations.”

The shoot-from-the-lip nature of social media continued after Tripathi’s body had been found and identified.

“Alas! An Indian killed by hyper nationalist racists in the US for mistaken identity,” one Facebook poster wrote, only to acknowledge some time later when the true circumstances of Tripathi’s death had been pointed out – by another Facebook poster – that “I should have been more circumspect.”

Brown University President Christina Paxson sent a message to the campus community Thursday saying Tripathi – the brother of two Brown graduates – would be remembered for his "gentle demeanor and generous spirit," the Associated Press reports. She described him as an accomplished saxophonist and a "serious, thoughtful, intellectually curious student and a brilliant writer."

In the statement Thursday, the family asked for their privacy to be respected and urged the public to “exercise caution and treat human lives with delicacy.”

“This last month has changed our lives forever, and we hope it will change yours too,’’ the family wrote. “Take care of one another. Be gentle, be compassionate. Be open to letting someone in when it is you who is faltering. Lend your hand. We need it. The world needs it.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.