St. Louis Rams give 'hands up' Ferguson sign in pregame. Appropriate?

Five members of the St. Louis Rams used the pregame introduction to give the 'hands up' gesture synonymous with Ferguson protesters supporting slain teen Michael Brown.

Jeff Curry/USA TODAY
St. Louis Rams wide receiver Stedman Bailey (12), wide receiver Tavon Austin (11), tight end Jared Cook (89), wide receiver Chris Givens (13), and wide receiver Kenny Britt (81) put their hands up to show support for Michael Brown before a game against the Oakland Raiders at the Edward Jones Dome Sunday.

The protests in nearby Ferguson, Mo., over the shooting death of black teen Michael Brown have made their way into St. Louis Rams games before. But before Sunday, never quite so conspicuously.

During the pregame introductions before the Rams' game against the Oakland Raiders, five members of the Rams receiving corps took the field amid flashing lights and fanfare – with their hands up.

The sign was a clear reference to the "hands up" gesture that has become synonymous with protests in support of Mr. Brown, who was shot by a white police officer on Aug. 9. Some eyewitnesses have said Brown was shot despite having his hands up, though much of the testimony heard by a grand jury was contradictory and confused.

On Monday, the grand jury decided not to indict the officer, Darren Wilson.

At a previous Rams home game against the San Francisco 49ers in October, some fans held protest signs linked to Ferguson, including a prominent one that read: "Rams fans know on and off the field black lives matter." Other fans marched in the aisles with their hands up.

But this was the first home game for the Rams since the grand jury decision, and the anger that has spilled over into civil disobedience through the St. Louis area and beyond, spilled onto the field Sunday.

The notion that athletes should simply play and put politics aside as a distraction is widely debated.

For some observers, athletes like Michael Jordan or Tiger Woods, who have refused to be drawn into issues of race, take the high ground. They are athletes, not activists, after all, and we don't pay to hear their opinions, we pay to see them play a game.

Yet to others, there is no demand that athletes must check deeply held convictions at the door of the locker room. To ignore injustice, they say, is a form of cowardice. In this view, Tommie Smith and John Carlos, the two American sprinters who made a black power salute atop the podium during the 1968 Summer Olympics, are heroes. Boxer Muhammad Ali was courageous for refusing to join the Army during Vietnam.

Compared with such protests, the one at the St. Louis Rams game Sunday was small. But it is in some ways a bellwether of the frustrations within the black community. For all the showboating and trash-taking that goes on in professional sports these days, genuine statements of conviction are rare. So total is the focus on sport that coaches, general managers, and owners are likely to see such protests as distractions – and to convey that to players.

If it's not about winning, then don't do it.

The fact that five Rams took the one moment they could be sure that the stadium was watching to show their solidarity with Ferguson, then, is significant. Clearly, it was coordinated. Clearly, it was something that felt that they could not not do. 

At a time when African-American activists are trying to resurrect the spirit of the civil rights era, the Rams pregame Sunday was only the smallest reminder of how those convulsive years swept onto Olympic podiums and into the ring.

And in that way, they are an indicator of how deeply Ferguson has touched America.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.