The NFL: 16 ways the game has changed in the Super Bowl era

Forty-seven years after the first Super Bowl was played in Los Angeles before a less-than-capacity crowd, let’s look back at some of the ways the NFL has changed.

15. Efforts to increase safety

While talk about head injuries, concussions, and helmet-on-helmet hits have attracted significant league and media attention of late, the NFL has been on a long march during the Super Bowl era to protect players (just see the extensive health and safety timeline on the NFL’s website).

In 1979, for example, the league declared it is unnecessary roughness “if a tackler uses his helmet to butt, spear, or ram an opponent, or if any player uses the crown or top of the helmet unnecessarily.” That is also the same year the league acted to protect stationary quarterbacks who were looking pass with an “in the grasp” rule. It calls for whistling a play dead once the quarterback is in the control of a tackler. So many other protective rules and clarifications of existing ones have been made in recent decades that some players worry the very nature of a macho game is being dangerously altered, and a sissified version ushered in.

The debate in this area will surely continue, but it seems clear that for its long-term survival, the NFL knows that football needs to keep addressing mounting safety concerns. Even President Obama, as Teddy Roosevelt once did 100 years ago, has shared his concerns about the safety. In an interview published in  'The New Republic' magazine, he said if he had sons he would think long and hard about allowing them to play. He also said that needed rule changes might make football a “bit less exciting,” but they would improve the sport for the players.

15 of 16

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.