NFL 2012: a banner year for rookie quarterbacks

As NFL’s 2012 season gets into full swing with Sunday’s games, a record five rookies prepare to take the field as starting quarterbacks. The old record was three in 1960. Not only will all four first-rounders in last spring’s draft – Andrew Luck, Robert Griffin III, Ryan Tannehill, and Brandon Weeden – be starters, but so too will Russell Wilson, Seattle’s third-round pick. In addition, the other six QBs taken in the draft, including the last player picked, all landed NFL jobs, as did three undrafted free agent signal callers. Here’s a rundown on these players, in the order of their selection:

1. Andrew Luck, Indianapolis Colts

AJ Mast/AP
Indianapolis Colts quarterback Andrew Luck on the sidelines in the second half of an NFL preseason football game against the Cincinnati Bengals in Indianapolis, Thursday, Aug. 30.

Drafted: #1 overall (in first round)

Pro status: starter

College team: Stanford

6 ft. 4 in., 234 lbs.

Hometown: Houston

QB rating in preseason: 89.3

All the teeth-gnashing over Peyton Manning’s departure is receding in Indianapolis as Andrew Luck shows himself worthy of being the league’s No. 1 overall draft pick. His first pass for the Colts went for a touchdown, always a good sign. has called him “the most NFL-ready rookie quarterback” since Manning entered the league in 1998. During the preseason he has shown himself to be a very fast learner, just the player to lead the team during a major rebuilding period under both a new coach (Chuck Pagano) and new general manager (Ryan Grigson). Sports Illustrated has picked the Colts to win five games after struggling to a 2-14 campaign in 2011, when Indianapolis missed the playoffs for the first time in 10 years. Luck, the son of former NFL quarterback Oliver Luck, was projected as a possible No. 1 pick after his junior year at Stanford, but he stuck around for a fourth year of college eligibility. In 2010 and 2011 he was both the Pac-12 Offensive Player of the Year and also the Heisman runner-up.

1 of 14

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.