Penn State football: A dozen questions as the post-Paterno era begins

This year will be the most closely watched football season in the history of Penn State. The post-Paterno era comes with many questions. Here are 12.

12. The book

How well has the recently released Joe Paterno biography done on the book market?

“Paterno” by Joe Posnanski, is gathering steam and reportedly assumes the No. 1 spot on The New York Times hardcover, nonfiction bestseller list. When Posnanski, an award-winning sportswriter, originally was contracted to write the authorized biography, it was before the Sandusky scandal broke. So in mid-stream, he found he had to write not just a salutary story but a sports tragedy as well. The difficulty may partly account for the mixed reviews and lukewarm sales. In retrospect, one of the more bittersweet anecdotes from the book is about how Paterno turned down a million-dollar offer to coach the lackluster New England Patriots in 1972. He previously had turned down overtures from the Steelers and Packers, but this was the richest package ever offered an NFL coach, including a 5 percent share of the team. He accepted the offer, but before a press conference could be held, Paterno’s then-6-year-old son David told his dad, “Don’t go.” And Paterno didn’t, changing his mind in a last-minute reversal that won him the sort of national admiration that slipped through his fingers suddenly at the end of his life. As the Associated Press described his decision to stay as a college coach: “In the long run, it came down to lots of money vs. lots of idealism, and for a change idealism won.”

12 of 12

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.