Spurs and Thunder star in NBA’s Western Conference Finals: 10 extra dimensions

The clash of the Spurs and Thunder in the NBA’s Western Conference finals may fly a bit under the national radar when it opens Sunday. Here are 10 factors that make this showdown intriguing.

4. Team histories

Both the Spurs and Thunder franchises were founded the same year – 1967 – but not in the cities they currently occupy or using their current names. The Spurs began their existence as the Dallas Chaparrals in the American Basketball Association, beating the NBA’s arrival in Texas by four years .

The Chaparrals did poorly at the box office, drawing only 134 fans for their final game in Dallas before moving to San Antonio and renaming themselves the Spurs in 1973. Three years later, the Spurs and three other ABA teams (Nuggets, Pacers, and Nets) joined the NBA.

The Thunder were the Seattle SuperSonics until team owner Clay Bennett moved the club to Oklahoma City in 2008 after he couldn’t work out a deal with Seattle for a new arena. He had to pay Seattle $75 million to settle a lawsuit meant to block the move.

Oklahoma City represented an attractive alternative given the strong support for the NBA between 2005 and 2007 when the league temporarily relocated the New Orleans Hornets to Oklahoma City while New Orleans was rebuilding after hurricane Katrina.

4 of 10

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.