Wheelchair accessible? Just ask Google Maps

Google Maps now has a feature that lists the wheelchair accessibility of a place, and relies on users to crowdsource the information. 

Dado Ruvic/Reuters
People are silhouetted as they pose with laptops in front of a screen projected with a Google logo in this picture illustration taken in Bosnia and Herzegovina in Oct. 2014. Google recently launched a feature in its Maps app that displays locations' accessibility.

Google is relying on crowdsourcing to make the world more wheelchair-friendly.

The search giant has launched a new feature through Google Maps that lists whether a location is wheelchair-accessible. Available only in the US to start, the feature relies on users to answer questions about the accessibility of a place they visit.

The new feature could impact millions of people in the United States. There are 2.2 million people in the US who depend on a wheelchair, according to The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But the information could also assist users who rely on walkers, canes, or crutches, of which there are another 6.5 million people in the US, as well as mothers with strollers.

The US has become increasingly more accessible since President George H.W. Bush signed the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) more than 25 years ago. But cyberspace hasn’t always kept up with this progress. The team at Google that worked on this feature hopes to change that.

“Accessibility at Google is a big deal,” Rio Akasaka, the project manager for the accessibility feature, told Business Insider. “But it’s often facilitated by whether or not there’s a legal requirement, or some sort of requirement we need to adhere to.”

In this case, Mr. Akasaka took it upon himself to start the project. Under a Google policy that allows an employee to spend 20 percent of their time working on a project unrelated to their main job, Akasaka and between five and 10 other Google employees dedicated themselves to introducing accessibility guidelines, according to Business Insider. Other projects that started under this rule include Google News, Gmail, and AdSense, according to Quartz.

“Local Guides” – users who answer questions in exchange for early access to new Google features – reported the wheelchair accessibility of places they visited. After collecting data over this past year, Google recently launched the feature.

A place’s wheelchair-accessibility is displayed as an amenity in Google Maps. The map tool already displays information about a place’s address, operating hours, how busy it is, and user reviews. Because the feature relies on user-submitted data, not every place has its accessibility listed in the Google Maps app. But the list is growing.  

The ADA, signed into law in 1990, requires new buildings to have wheelchair access. But the requirements for structures built prior to the act’s signing are less strict, according to TechCrunch.

The new Google feature also marks progress for extending accessibility to cyberspace, something that hasn’t always been consistent in the past. A 2012 study indicates that most public library websites did not comply with accessibility standards required of government-funded institutions, as The Christian Science Monitor noted in 2014.

Among commercial websites, fewer than five percent of online shopping sites meet the needs of people with disabilities, Brian Landrigan, the head of sales and marketing for The Paciello Group, which specializes in software accessibility, told the Monitor.  

Public pressure has forced other technology companies to improve their accessibility. After Uber and Lyft faced allegations that they  discriminated against people with disabilities, Uber expanded the number of cities in which it offers services to people with all wheelchair types, from folding wheelchairs to motorized ones.

Whether it’s through complaints or the initiative of people like Akasaka, technological innovations have “triggered a sea change” for accessibility, as the Monitor reported in 2014: 

Mainstream innovations such as Siri double as assistive technologies, while robotics, bionics, and 3-D printers have revolutionized the design and manufacture of prostheses. And mobile phones and tablets have opened an entirely new field: apps. An ever-growing list of applications ranges from hearing aids to maps for people with low vision to communications methods for children diagnosed with autism. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.