How does the well-being in your state stack up?

Hawaii topped the list of the healthiest states this year, followed by perpetually high-scoring states such as Vermont and Minnesota. On the other end of the spectrum, Mississippi once again ranked at the bottom of the list. 

Carlos Delgado/AP Images for Dole Packaged Foods
Hawaiian dancers perform during Dole's Family Day Luau on Sunday at Fiesta Floats in Irwindale, Calif. The dancers will perform alongside the Dole Packaged Foods 'Spirit of Hawaii' float during the 2017 Tournament of Rose Parade.

Residents of Hawaii have something to celebrate Thursday after the United Health Foundation’s 2016 Annual Report revealed the state to be the healthiest in the country for the fifth year in a row.

The Annual Report’s findings are based on data provided by the Census Bureau, the American Medical Association, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, among others, and measure a slate of factors, from obesity to childhood poverty rates to vegetable consumption.

While many categories saw overall improvement over the past year, experts say that there is still much more to be done. And some are particularly worried about the changes next year could bring, especially if president-elect Donald Trump follows through on his promise to dismantle the Affordable Care Act.

“There are clearly states that have been more innovative in their health policies than others, and there are some states where social norms are more conducive to healthy living,” says Matthew Kreuter, a professor of public health at Washington University, St. Louis. “All of these factors play a role in how healthy the people who live in a given place are.”

Generally, Dr. Kreuter tells The Christian Science Monitor in a phone interview, more liberal states are the most concerned about public health policy and are where politicians are most likely to have the political will to make big changes in the public health sphere.

Perhaps, then, it is no surprise that some of the nation’s most liberal states top the health rankings. The top five states, according to the 2016 Annual Report, are as follows: Hawaii, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Minnesota, and Vermont.

Yet while Hawaiians can rejoice (yet again) over their good health, the bottom five states also remain relatively stagnant, with Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, Arkansas, and Oklahoma again trailing the list.

Mississippi fell to number 50 this year from being ranked 49th, in part due to high rates of children living in poverty and high smoking and obesity rates. More than a third of Mississippi residents are obese, according to the report. In the past year, obesity rates have increased countrywide by seven percent, as well.

Nevertheless, 2016 was a good year for many sectors of the population. The number of children living in poverty nationwide decreased by seven percent, to nearly 20 percent of children, while the number of uninsured individuals also shrank to approximately 10 percent of the population.

Yet many challenges remain, note some experts.

“Some of the biggest challenges in public health in the coming years are going to be in the proposed changes in social and economic structures – changes to income and changes to education,” says Sandro Galea, dean of Boston University’s School of Public Health.

While the status of children, in particular, saw improvement this year, some experts say that they are poised to be among the most vulnerable populations over the next several years, particularly if Trump follows through on his proposal to repeal the Affordable Care Act.

“There are both short term and long term consequences to having children uninsured. Children who are uninsured have worse access to care, and when a child becomes uninsured, the entire family is at risk for medical debt or bankruptcy,” says Joan Alker executive director of Georgetown University’s Center for Children and Families, the author of a report on Medicaid's impact on children. 

“In the long term, having health coverage can help children to attend school more regularly, and those children have higher graduation rates and college attendance rates, which in turn reduces their impact on societal resources when it becomes easier for these children to get jobs. There’s a definite long term return on investment.”

Dr. Alker says that many children’s health advocates are concerned that losing ACA coverage will reduce the numbers of children who are covered by health insurance. Currently, 95 percent of children are insured.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.