Fourth of July gets louder: Victory for the individual, but what about the commons?

Lighting firecrackers, for many Americans, is a visceral expression of individual freedom – one that has spread since 2000. Only three states with total bans on fireworks sales remain.

|
Ross D. Franklin/AP
Brian Herrman, a co-owner of Red Hot Fireworks in Phoenix, restocks shelves as sales of fireworks have been brisk at the store. Arizona, despite a drought, loosened its restrictions this year and allowed residents of the two most populated cities to set off fireworks around Independence Day.

When Georgia joined six other states to liberalize fireworks regulations in 2015, lawmakers were, in one way, heeding the words of John Adams, who urged Americans to forevermore celebrate the Declaration of Independence with “Guns, Bells, Bonfires and Illuminations.”

Lighting firecrackers, for many Americans, is a visceral expression of individual freedom – one that has spread since 2000. Only three states with total bans on fireworks sales remain – Massachusetts, Delaware, and New Jersey – down from 30.

But while more residents on Independence Day are celebrating the freedom to launch bottle rockets and blow up Matchbox cars in the front yard, new research suggests that, not surprisingly, liberalized fireworks laws have begun contributing to serious injury rates and hospital visits. The increase in emergency room visits, critics say, are raising stubborn questions about whether increased tax revenues through the sale of fireworks are, in fact, a reasonable trade-off for letting Americans go to town with explosions on the Fourth of July.

“There are 20,000 trips to emergency rooms across the country every July 4 … [y]et, for all our bragging, parading, and blowing ourselves up for freedom, we really don’t understand the concept,” writes Ian Gurvitz, a Hollywood writer and author of  “Hello, the Agent Lied.” “The Declaration of Independence begins with ‘we, the people’ not ‘I, the person’ … yet, our popular notion of freedom is based on the simplistic notion that we can all just do whatever we want without government interference.”

At the very least, the growth of the US fireworks industry into an $800 million a year behemoth adds nuance to how Roman candles correlate with the meaning of personal freedom on the republic's 240th birthday. The freedom to handle dangerous fireworks is a thorny issue that pits American folk culture and tradition against public safety concerns that impact society more broadly.

“It’s fitting that fireworks are such a big part of America’s Fourth of July celebrations,” writes Virginia Rohan, in The Record, a New Jersey newspaper. “Our country, after all, declared its freedom with a big bang, not a wimpy whimper.”

Yet restrictions on fireworks have been around since almost the birth of the country. Both New York City and Charleston, S.C., enacted fireworks bans in 1786, a decade after independence, in order to avoid urban conflagrations.

Supporters say rising awareness of the inherent risks have grown along with the availability of consumer fireworks. By some measures, it appears that overall injury rates have dropped when compared to steady increases in fireworks tonnage.

But the US saw a sharp uptick in injuries as fireworks restrictions were eased from Michigan to West Virginia last year. And researchers are beginning to find links between liberalized fireworks laws and more serious injuries. In 2006, 29 percent of fireworks accidents resulted in a hospital stay. That percentage climbed to 50 percent in 2012.

”We are seeing that by about two years after a [fireworks] law has weakened, the injury rate starts to noticeably increase,” John Myers, a lead author of one such study, tells CNN.

Those findings suggest that it “may be time for lawmakers to reassess this issue,” adds Dr. Charles Wood, in the same article.

A re-think on fireworks availability, to some, would hardly be a direct attack on American freedom.

“Declaring everyone free is not the same as declaring life a free-for-all,” adds Mr. Gurvitz. “Speed limits, stops signs, and traffic lights aren’t limits on our freedom to drive as fast as we want. They’re rules for the common good. Freedom is something we experience individually, and share collectively.”

Additionally, celebrating American ideals with pageantry and sparks may be less of a factor in fireworks growth than the fact that “doing dangerous stuff in your cousin’s backyard is an important element of American folk culture,” as Troy Patterson notes in Slate.

After all, 4 in 10 Americans could not name a single one of the five freedoms described in the First Amendment, according to a new First Amendment Center study.

Not knowing those “may not be the same as not knowing you have those core freedoms … [b]ut neither does it build confidence that as a nation we have a deep understanding of … what … is so fundamental to the unique American experience of self-governance,” writes Gene Policinski, the senior vice president.

He adds: “So in the spirit of our national July 4th holiday … [j]oin in the fireworks ... [a]nd repeat after me [the First Amendment’s freedoms]: religion, speech, press, assembly and petition.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Fourth of July gets louder: Victory for the individual, but what about the commons?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2016/0704/Fourth-of-July-gets-louder-Victory-for-the-individual-but-what-about-the-commons
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe