Patriot's Tom Brady breaks silence on 'Deflategate' suspension

One day after the NFL upheld Tom Brady's punishment for the 'Deflategate' scandal, the quarterback defended himself in a Facebook post. 

Shannon Stapleton/Reuters
New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady arrives at NFL headquarters as people ask for autographs in New York on June 23. NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell upheld the four-game suspension given to Mr. Brady for his role in a scheme to deflate the footballs in the AFC championship game that put the Patriots in the Super Bowl.

One day after Roger Goodell, commissioner of the National Football League, upheld Tom Brady’s punishment for the “Deflategate” scandal, the Patriots quarterback broke his silence in a Facebook post. 

In the 507-word post, Mr. Brady wrote that he “did nothing wrong, and no one in the Patriots organization did either.” The three-time Super Bowl MVP also denied allegations that he destroyed his cell phone to prevent investigators from gaining access. 

"To suggest that I destroyed a phone to avoid giving the NFL information it requested is completely wrong," Brady wrote, referring to accusations that he decided he needed to trade in a defective phone only after the NFL requested that he hand it over. "There is no 'smoking gun' and this controversy is manufactured to distract from the fact they have zero evidence of wrongdoing.”

The quarterback was suspended for four games and the team was fined $1 million and denied two draft picks when it was discovered that deflated footballs were used in the American Football Conference championship game against the Indianapolis Colts. According to investigator Ted Wells, Brady was “at least generally aware” of the deflations. 

The punishments were first handed down in May. At that time, The Christian Science Monitor’s Alexander LaCasse noted that “Brady's suspension seems harsh compared to punishments handed down to other players,” such as former Tampa Bay Buccaneers quarterback Brad Johnson, “who admitted to paying ball boys to scuff up footballs used in the 2003 Super Bowl against Oakland” and was not investigated by the league. 

In Wednesday’s Facebook post, Brady wrote that he was “very disappointed” by the NFL’s decision to uphold the suspension, adding, ”I will not allow my unfair discipline to become a precedent for other NFL players without a fight.”

At press time, three hours after it was posted on Facebook, Brady’s statement had more than 200,000 likes and 30,000 comments. 

This isn’t the first time the New England Patriots have been punished for breaking the rules, as noted by the Monitor's Mr. LaCasse. In 2007, the team was fined $250,000 and docked a first-round draft pick for a scandal known as “Spygate," in which the Patriots were found to have videotaped the signals of an opposing team's coach. 

The Patriots are scheduled to open training camp later Wednesday.

This report includes materials from the Associated Press. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.