Wisconsin spa killings: Shooting followed tragic script of domestic violence

The events leading up to Radcliffe Haughton killing his wife, two other women, and himself at a Wisconsin spa followed a familiar path: threats, a restraining order, and police visits to their home.

John Gress/Reuters
Police walk past the Azana Salon and Spa in Brookfield, Wisconsin, October 21, where Radcliffe Haughton shot seven women, killing three, and then himself.
Brookfield Police Dept/AP
This photo provided by the Brookfield Police Dept. shows Radcliffe Haughton, of Brown Deer, Wisconsin.

The circumstances involved in a mass killing outside Milwaukee on Sunday correspond to what many already know about domestic partner abuse: The signs are often as clear as day that the situation will one day turn deadly.

Radcliffe Haughton shot seven women, killing three, and then himself at a spa in Brookfield, Wis., a suburb west of Milwaukee, Sunday. One of the victims is Zina Haughton, his estranged wife. In her recent application for a restraining order, Ms. Haughton said her husband “said he would kill me if I left him or ever contacted the police.”

The shooting took place three weeks into what the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence recognizes as Domestic Violence Awareness Month. According to a survey on criminal victimization conducted by the Bureau of Justice Statistics and released last week, the number of incidents of domestic violence jumped 20 percent in 2011, from 1.1 million to 1.4 million, over the previous year. Between 2002 and 2011, these same incidents increased 3 percent. The data does not track homicides.

The large majority of these assaults are classified as intimate partner violence, a subset designation addressing violence between current or former spouses, boyfriends, or girlfriends. In 2011 alone, intimate partner violence accounted for 63 percent of domestic violence incidents. Even though violence between partners increased 10 percent from 2010 to 2011, it was still down 8 percent from 2002.

Intimate partner violence typically involves serial batterers who commit the same acts over a sustained period of time, a trajectory that runs counter to what researchers know about general violent offenders, whose deadly behavior tends to diminish with age.

“If anything, [batterers] tend to get more violent over time,” says Angela Hattery, an associate director of women and gender studies at George Mason University in Washington who has written extensively on intimate partner violence.

Details emerging about Radcliffe and Zina Haughton suggest their relationship was at a high risk for homicide dating back nearly two years.

On Jan. 8, 2011, police were called to their home in the village of Brown Deer, a Milwaukee suburb, where police saw Radcliffe Haughton at the front window with what looked to be a shotgun. Zina Haughton told police her husband threw her clothes and bedding outside and poured tomato juice on her vehicle. She said her husband did not own any guns. The standoff took 90 minutes but did not end in Mr. Haughton’s arrest. Instead, according to the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, police took the unusual step of asking county prosecutors to later charge Mr. Haughton with misdemeanor disorderly conduct, domestic abuse.

The charge was dismissed a week later after both Zina Haughton and a police officer tasked with identifying her husband failed to show up in court.

Police returned to the home Oct. 2 this year, once again in response to a call from Zina Haughton. Upon their arrival, they reported bruises on her face although she denied being assaulted by her husband, who was not home at the time of their arrival. She was granted a four-year restraining order against Radcliffe Haughton on Oct. 8, and last Thursday a court issued an injunction barring him from possessing firearms.

Ms. Hattery says the narrative is “very typical” of intimate partner abuse that ends in homicide.

“Victims are often afraid to tell the truth about what is happening. They are afraid [the batterer] has a gun, so they are trying to de-escalate the situation,” she says. “One thing we know is [the homicide] often occurs when victims try to leave a relationship.”

Also troublesome are data that show, in most cases, there is little accountability for those facing charges related to domestic violence. Oftentimes the charges are dropped – as was the case with Haughton – or defendants are assigned to an intervention program that addresses ancillary issues like anger management or substance abuse.

Hattery’s research shows that, in most counties across the US, more than half of those with domestic violence convictions complete just half the sessions, while nearly half don’t bother to show up at all.

The severity of punishment depends on the awareness of the court system addressing each case, says Hattery.

“It is very locally dependent: In communities where you have a lot of activism from organizations fighting domestic violence, you have a lot of support inside the local justice system. In counties where there’s not a lot of traction, there’s not nearly enough of a response,” she says. “A lot of people walk around with a sanitized version of [domestic violence], I don’t think they truly understand the depths of it. If they did, it would be hard for most decent people to turn away.”

Another factor working against Zina Haughton was her gender. Most victims of intimate partner violence are women, according to a 2010 study by the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control in Atlanta that found about 1 in 4 women (24.3 percent) and 1 in 7 men (13.8 percent) have experienced severe physical violence by an intimate partner.

The 2010 annual crime report published by the Federal Bureau of Investigation found that 4.6 percent of homicide victims that year were wives, compared with 1 percent of husbands. The same dynamic is true of girlfriends to boyfriends: 3.8 percent to 1 percent. Data for 2011 has not yet been released.

Years ago the gap was tighter, but what helped lower victim rates for men was the emergence of domestic abuse outreach organizations that women seek out for safety, says Katherine van Wormer, who teaches social work at the University of Northern Iowa in Cedar Falls and who has written on domestic abuse.

“The homicide rate numbers were about equal before the days of women’s shelters and hotlines. The women often acted in self-defense because they were scared to death. Now there’s an alternative [to homicide] for women,” Ms. van Wormer says.

Zina Haughton wrote that her husband thought she was unfaithful and described the threats as both physical and verbal in her application for the restraining order, filed in the circuit court for Milwaukee County and dated Oct. 8.

“His threats terrorize my every waking moment,” she wrote, saying he threatened to throw acid at her or burn her and her family with gas. “He said he would kill me if I left him or ever contacted the police.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.